К содержанию
2 . 2025

Список литературы

    9. Список литературы

    1. Johri A.M. et al. Recommendations for the assessment of carotid arterial plaque by ultrasound for the characterization of atherosclerosis and evaluation of cardiovascular risk: from the American Society of Echocardiography // J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2020. Vol. 33, N 8. P. 917-933.

    2. Гусев Е.И., Коновалов А.Н., Скворцова В.И. Неврология: национальное руководство. 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. Москва : ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2018. Т. 1. 880 с.

    3. Клинические рекомендации "Ишемический инсульт и транзиторная ишемическая атака у взрослых". Год утверждения: 2021. Разработчики клинических рекомендаций: Всероссийское общество неврологов, Национальная ассоциация по борьбе с инсультом, Ассоциация нейрохирургов России, МОО Объединение нейроанестезиологов и нейрореаниматологов, Союз реабилитологов России.

    4. Sacco R.L. et al. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association // Stroke. 2013. Vol. 44, N 7. P. 2064-2089.

    5. Johansson E., Fox A.J. Carotid near-occlusion: a comprehensive review, part 1 - definition, terminology, and diagnosis // AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2016. Vol. 37, N 1. P. 2-10.

    6. Saba L. et al. Carotid plaque-RADS: a novel stroke risk classification system // JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2024. Vol. 17, N 1. P. 62-75.

    7. Johansson E. et al. Carotid near-occlusion can be identified with ultrasound by low flow velocity distal to the stenosis // Acta Radiol. 2019. Vol. 60, N 3. P. 396-404.

    8. Johansson E., Gu T., Fox A.J. Defining carotid near-occlusion with full collapse: a pooled analysis // Neuroradiology. 2022. Vol. 64, N 1. P. 59-67.

    9. Holmgren M. et al. Diagnostic separation of conventional ≥50% carotid stenosis and near-occlusion with phase-contrast MRI // Eur. Stroke J. 2024. Vol. 9, N 1. P. 135-143.

    10. Easton J.D. et al. Definition and evaluation of transient ischemic attack // Stroke. 2009. Vol. 40, N 6. P. 2276-2293.

    11. Kim Y.H., Sung M.S., Park S.W. Clinical features of ocular ischemic syndrome and risk factors for neovascular glaucoma // Korean J. Ophthalmol. 2017. Vol. 31, N 4. P. 343.

    12. Mendrinos E., Machinis T.G., Pournaras C.J. Ocular ischemic syndrome // Surv. Ophthalmol. 2010. Vol. 55, N 1. P. 2-34.

    13. Robinson R.W., Demirel M., LeBeau R.J. Natural history of cerebral thrombosis nine to nineteen year follow-up // J. Chronic Dis. 1968. Vol. 21, N 4. P. 221-230.

    14. Bogousslavsky J., Melle G. Van, Regli F. The Lausanne Stroke Registry: analysis of 1,000 consecutive patients with first stroke // Stroke. 1988. Vol. 19, N 9. P. 1083-1092.

    15. Foulkes M.A. et al. The Stroke Data Bank: design, methods, and baseline characteristics // Stroke. 1988. Vol. 19, N 5. P. 547-554.

    16. Inzitari D. et al. The causes and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic internal-carotid-artery stenosis // N. Engl. J. Med. 2000. Vol. 342, N 23. P. 1693-1701.

    17. Johnson C.O. et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 // Lancet Neurol. 2019. Vol. 18, N 5. P. 439-458.

    18. The Burden of Stroke in Europe Report [Electronic resource]. URL: https://strokeeurope.eu/ (date of access April 28, 2024).

    19. Cardiovascular Research: Projections into 2035 - Worldwide [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.worldwide.com/blog/2017/03/cardiovascular-research-cvd-heart-disease/ (date of access April 28, 2024).

    20. Мачинский П.А. и др. Сравнительная характеристика показателей заболеваемости ишемическим и геморрагическим инсультом в России // Известия высших учебных заведений. Поволжский регион. Медицинские науки. 2019. Т. 50, № 2. С. 112-132.

    21. Концевая А.В. и др. Экономический ущерб от сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний в Российской Федерации в 2016 году // Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии. 2018. Т. 14, № 2. С. 156-166.

    22. Игнатьева В.И. и др. Социально-экономическое бремя инсульта в Российской Федерации. // Журнал неврологии и психиатрии имени С.С. Корсакова. Спецвыпуски. 2023. Т. 123, № 8‑2. С. 5-15.

    23. Бокерия Л.А. и др. Сердечно-сосудистая хирургия - 2022. Болезни и врожденные аномалии системы кровообращения. Москва, 2023. 344 с.

    24. Bulwa Z., Gupta A. Embolic stroke of undetermined source: the role of the nonstenotic carotid plaque // J. Neurol. Sci. 2017. Vol. 382. P. 49-52.

    25. Nordestgaard B.G. et al. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: Consensus Statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society // Eur. Heart J. 2013. Vol. 34, N 45. P. 3478-3490.

    26. Flaherty M.L. et al. Carotid artery stenosis as a cause of stroke // Neuroepidemiology. 2013. Vol. 40, N 1. P. 36-41.

    27. den Brok M.G.H.E. et al. Prevalence and risk factors of symptomatic carotid stenosis in patients with recent transient ischaemic attack or ischaemic stroke in the Netherlands // Eur. Stroke J. 2020. Vol. 5, N 3. P. 271-277.

    28. Rosales J.S. et al. Fall in the proportion of atherothrombotic strokes during the last decade // J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2020. Vol. 29, N 12. Article ID 105257.

    29. Hackam D.G., Spence J.D. Decline in the severity of carotid atherosclerosis and associated risk factors from 2002 to 2014 // Stroke. 2018. Vol. 49, N 11. P. 2786-2788.

    30. Fairhead J.F., Mehta Z., Rothwell P.M. Population-based study of delays in carotid imaging and surgery and the risk of recurrent stroke // Neurology. 2005. Vol. 65, N 3. P. 371-375.

    31. De Weerd M. et al. Prevalence of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the general population: an individual participant data meta-analysis // Stroke. 2010. Vol. 41, N 6. P. 1294-1297.

    32. Song P. et al. Global and regional prevalence, burden, and risk factors for carotid atherosclerosis: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and modelling study // Lancet Glob. Health 2020. Vol. 8, N 5. P. e721-e729.

    33. Flaherty M.L. et al. Population-based study of symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion incidence and long-term follow-up // Stroke. 2004. Vol. 35, N 8. P. e349- e352.

    34. Mead G.E. et al. Carotid disease in acute stroke // Age Ageing. 1998. Vol. 27. P. 677-682.

    35. Thiele B.L. et al. Correlation of arteriographic findings and symptoms in cerebrovascular disease // Neurology. 1980. Vol. 30, N 10. P. 1041-1046.

    36. Покровский А.В. Клиническая ангиология : руководство для врачей. Москва : Медицина, 2004. Т. 1. 808 p.

    37. Barnett H.J.M. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Methods, patient characteristics, and progress // Stroke. 1991. Vol. 22, N 6. P. 711-720.

    38. Walker M.D. et al. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis // JAMA. 1995. Vol. 273, N 18. P. 1421-1428.

    39. Mohammed N., Anand S.S. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomized controlled trial. MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative Group // Lancet. 2004. Vol. 363, N 9420. P. 1491-1502.

    40. Eckstein H.H. et al. Diagnosis, treatment and follow-up in extracranial carotid stenosis // Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2020. Vol. 117, N 47. P. 801-807.

    41. Abbott A.L. et al. Systematic Review of guidelines for the management of asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis // Stroke. 2015. Vol. 46, N 11. P. 3288-3301.

    42. Ye H. et al. White matter hyperintensities and their subtypes in patients with carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis // BMJ Open. 2018. Vol. 8, N 5. Article ID e020830.

    43. Kamtchum-Tatuene J. et al. Prevalence of high-risk plaques and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis // JAMA Neurol. 2020. Vol. 77, N 12. P. 1524-1535.

    44. Nadareishvili Z.G. et al. Long-term risk of stroke and other vascular events in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis // Arch. Neurol. 2002. Vol. 59, N 7. P. 1162-1166.

    45. Perk J. et al. European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012): The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR) // Eur. Heart J. 2012. Vol. 33, N 13. P. 1635-1701.

    46. Greenland P. et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010. Vol. 56, N 25. P. e50-e103.

    47. Den Hartog A.G. et al. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and the risk of ischemic stroke according to subtype in patients with clinical manifest arterial disease // Stroke. 2013. Vol. 44, N 4. P. 1002-1007.

    48. Hadar N. et al. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis treated with medical therapy alone: temporal trends and implications for risk assessment and the design of future studies // Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2014. Vol. 38, N 3. P. 163-173.

    49. Abbott A.L. et al. What should we do with asymptomatic carotid stenosis? // Int. J. Stroke. 2007. Vol. 2, N 1. P. 27-39.

    50. Näslund U. et al. Visualization of asymptomatic atherosclerotic disease for optimum cardiovascular prevention (VIPVIZA): a pragmatic, open-label, randomised controlled trial // Lancet. 2019. Vol. 393, N 10 167. P. 133-142.

    51. Saratzis A., Naylor R. 30 day outcomes after carotid interventions: an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials in asymptomatic patients // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2022. Vol. 63, N 1. P. 157-158.

    52. Brott T.G. et al. 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary // Circulation. 2011. Vol. 124, N 4. P. 489-532.

    53. Cosentino F. et al. 2019 ESC guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD // Eur. Heart J. 2020. Vol. 41, N 2. P. 255-323.

    54. Mach F. et al. 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk // Atherosclerosis. 2019. Vol. 290, N 1. P. 140-205.

    55. AbuRahma A.F. et al. Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines for management of extracranial cerebrovascular disease // J. Vasc. Surg. 2022. Vol. 75, N 1S. P. 4S-22S.

    56. Krist A.H. et al. Screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement // JAMA. 2021. Vol. 325, N 5. P. 476-481.

    57. Bonati L.H. et al. European Stroke Organisation guideline on endarterectomy and stenting for carotid artery stenosis // Eur. Stroke J. 2021. Vol. 6, N 2. P. I-XLVII.

    58. Naylor R. et al. Editor’s choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 clinical practice guidelines on the management of atherosclerotic carotid and vertebral artery disease // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2023. Vol. 65, N 1. P. 7-111.

    59. Poorthuis M.H.F. et al. Development and internal validation of a risk score to detect asymptomatic carotid stenosis // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2021. Vol. 61, N 3. P. 365-373.

    60. De Weerd M. et al. Prediction of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the general population: identification of high-risk groups // Stroke. 2014. Vol. 45, N 8. P. 2366-2371.

    61. Poorthuis M.H.F. et al. Detection of asymptomatic carotid stenosis in patients with lower-extremity arterial disease: development and external validations of a risk score // Br. J. Surg. 2021. Vol. 108, N 8. P. 960-967.

    62. Zeltzer L. Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) // Stroke Engine. 2008.

    63. Ortiz G.A., Sacco R.L. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) // Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. John Wiley, 2014.

    64. Ghoneim B.M. et al. Systematic review of the relationship between Hollenhorst plaques and cerebrovascular events // Vascular. 2023. Mar 13.

    65. Barnett H., Peerless S., Kaufmann J. "Stump" of internal carotid artery - a source for further cerebral embolic ischemia // Stroke. 1978. Vol. 9, N 5. P. 448-456.

    66. Klijn C.J.M. et al. Symptomatic carotid artery occlusion // Stroke. 1997. Vol. 28, N 10. P. 2084-2093.

    67. Pessin M.S. et al. Mechanisms of acute carotid stroke // Ann. Neurol. 1979. Vol. 6, N 3. P. 245-252.

    68. Yamauchi H., Fukuyama H., Nagahama Y. et al. Evidence of misery perfusion and risk for recurrent stroke in major cerebral arterial occlusive diseases from PET // J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1996 1996. Vol. 61, N 1. P. 18-25.

    69. Hupperts R.M.M., Lodder J., Heuts-van Raak E.P.M. et al. Borderzone brain infarcts on CT taking into account the variability in vascular supply areas // Cerebrovasc. Dis. 1996. Vol. 6. P. 294-300.

    70. Omae T. et al. Inapparent hemodynamic insufficiency exacerbates ischemic damage in a rat microembolic stroke model // Stroke. 2000. Vol. 31, N 10. P. 2494-2499.

    71. Weimar C. et al. Neurologic worsening during the acute phase of ischemic stroke // Arch. Neurol. 2005. Vol. 62, N 3. P. 393-397.

    72. Yanagihara T., Piepgras D.G., Klass D.W. Repetitive involuntary movement associated with episodic cerebral ischemia // Ann. Neurol. 1985. Vol. 18, N 2. P. 244- 250.

    73. Tatemichi T.K. et al. Perfusion insufficiency in limb-shaking transient ischemic attacks // Stroke. 1990. Vol. 21, N 2. P. 341-347.

    74. Furlan A.J., Whisnant J.P., Kearns T.P. Unilateral visual loss in bright light. An unusual symptom of carotid artery occlusive disease // Arch. Neurol. 1979. Vol. 36, N 11. P. 675-676.

    75. Klijn C.J.M. et al. Recurrent ischemia in symptomatic carotid occlusion: prognostic value of hemodynamic factors // Neurology. 2000. Vol. 55, N 12. P. 1806-1812.

    76. Klijn C.J.M. et al. Venous stasis retinopathy in symptomatic carotid artery occlusion: Prevalence, cause, and outcome // Stroke. 2002. Vol. 33, N 3. P. 695-701.

    77. Kashiwazaki D. et al. Carotid occlusive disease presenting with loss of consciousness // Neurol. Surg. 2005. Vol. 33, N 1. P. 29-34.

    78. Tatemichi T.K. et al. Dementia associated with bilateral carotid occlusions: neuropsychological and haemodynamic course after extracranial to intracranial bypass surgery // J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1995. Vol. 58, N 5. P. 633-636.

    79. Younkin D. et al. Superficial temporal-middle cerebral artery anastomosis: effects on vascular, neurologic, and neuropsychological functions // Neurology. 1985. Vol. 35, N 4. P. 462-469.

    80. Мельникова Е.В. и др. Модифицированная шкала Рэнкина - универсальный инструмент оценки независимости и инвалидизации пациентов в медицинской реабилитации [Электронный ресурс] // Consilium Medicum. 2017. Т. 19, № 2.1. С. 8-13. URL: https://omnidoctor.ru/library/izdaniya-dlya-vrachey/consilium-medicum/cm2017/cm_2017_2.1_fiz/modifitsirovannaya-shkala-renkina-universalnyy-instrument-otsenki-nezavisimosti-i-invalidizatsii-pats/ (дата обращения: 30.04.2024).

    81. Eckstein H.-H., Kühnl A., Kallmayer M. Leitlinien kommentiert Wichtige Empfehlungen der deutsch-österreichischen S3-Leitlinie zum Management extrakranieller Karotisstenosen // Chirurg. 2022. Vol. 93. P. 476-484.

    82. Bazan H.A. et al. A stroke/vascular neurology service increases the volume of urgent carotid endarterectomies performed in a tertiary referral center // Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2014. Vol. 28, N 5. P. 1172-1177.

    83. Rothwell P., Warlow C. Is self-audit reliable? // Lancet. 1995. Vol. 346, N 8990. P. 1623.

    84. Theiss W. et al. Pro-CAS: a prospective registry of carotid angioplasty and stenting // Stroke. 2004. Vol. 35, N 9. P. 2134-2139.

    85. Rojoa D.M. et al. Ultrasonography for the diagnosis of extra-cranial carotid occlusion - diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis // Vasa. 2020. Vol. 49, N 3. P. 195-204.

    86. Koelemay M.J.W. et al. Systematic review of computed tomographic angiography for assessment of carotid artery disease // Stroke. 2004. Vol. 35, N 10. P. 2306-2312.

    87. Wardlaw J. et al. Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis // Lancet. 2006. Vol. 367, N 9521. P. 1503-1512.

    88. Cassola N. et al. Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2022. Vol. 7, N 7. CD013172.

    89. Балахонова Т.В. и др. Фокусированное ультразвуковое исследование сосудов. Консенсус российских экспертов // Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика. 2022. Т. 21, № 7. С. 105-126.

    90. Johri A.M. et al. Focused vascular ultrasound for the assessment of atherosclerosis: a proof-of-concept study // J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2016. Vol. 29, N 9. P. 842-849.

    91. Patel S.G. et al. Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy // J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2002. Vol. 73, N 1. P. 21-28.

    92. Zavanone C., Ragone E., Samson Y. Concordance rates of Doppler ultrasound and CT angiography in the grading of carotid artery stenosis: a systematic literature review // J. Neurol. 2012. Vol. 259, N 6. P. 1015-1018.

    93. Saba L. et al. State-of-the-art CT and MR imaging and assessment of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: standardization of scanning protocols and measurements-a consensus document by the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR) // Eur. Radiol. 2023. Vol. 33, N 2. P. 1063-1087.

    94. Barlinn K. et al. Validation of multiparametric ultrasonography criteria with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery disease: a prospective multicenter study // Ultraschall. Med. 2018. Vol. 39, N 5. P. 535-543.

    95. Hakimi R., Sivakumar S. Imaging of carotid dissection // Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2019. Vol. 23, N 1. P. 2.

    96. Arous E.J. et al. Institutional differences in carotid artery duplex diagnostic criteria result in significant variability in classification of carotid artery stenoses and likely lead to disparities in care // Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes. 2014. Vol. 7, N 3. P. 423-429.

    97. Warlow C. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis // Lancet. 1991. Vol. 337, N 8752. P. 1235-1243.

    98. Rothwell P.M. et al. Prognostic value and reproducibility of measurements of carotid stenosis. A comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group // Stroke. 1994. Vol. 25, N 12. P. 2440-2444.

    99. Saba L. et al. Quantifying carotid stenosis: history, current applications, limitations, and potential: how imaging is changing the scenario // Life (Basel). 2024. Vol. 14, N 1. P. 73.

    100. Meves S.H. et al. Recanalization of acute symptomatic occlusions of the internal carotid artery // J. Neurol. 2002. Vol. 249, N 2. P. 188-192.

    101. Hause S. et al. Acute symptomatic extracranial internal carotid occlusion - natural course and clinical impact // Vasa. 2020. Vol. 49, N 1. P. 31-38.

    102. Debette S. et al. ESO guideline for the management of extracranial and intracranial artery dissection // Eur. Stroke J. 2021. Vol. 6, N 3. P. XXXIX-LXXXVIII.

    103. Pakizer D. et al. Peak systolic velocity ratio for evaluation of internal carotid artery stenosis correlated with plaque morphology: substudy results of the ANTIQUE study // Front. Neurol. 2023. Vol. 14. Article ID 1206483.

    104. Polak J.F., Alexandrov A.V. Accuracy of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) Carotid Doppler Velocity Criteria for Grading North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Stenosis: a meta-analysis // J. Ultrasound Med. 2023. Vol. 42, N 7. P. 1423-1435.

    105. Updated Recommendations for Carotid Stenosis Interpretation Criteria-November 2023 IAC Vascular Testing Communication Updated Recommendations for Carotid Stenosis Interpretation Criteria Strongly Recommended Modification of the SRU Consensus Conference Criteria for Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis for Implementation in IAC-Accredited Vascular Laboratories Additional Parameters Primary Parameters.

    106. Gornik H.L. et al. Optimization of duplex velocity criteria for diagnosis of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis: a report of the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) Vascular Testing Division Carotid Diagnostic Criteria Committee // Vasc. Med. 2021. Vol. 26, N 5. P. 515-525.

    107. Barlinn K. et al. Multi-parametric ultrasound criteria for internal carotid artery disease-comparison with CT angiography // Neuroradiology. 2016. Vol. 58, N 9. P. 845-851.

    108. Oates C.P. et al. Joint recommendations for reporting carotid ultrasound investigations in the United Kingdom // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2009. Vol. 37, N 3. P. 251-261.

    109. Grant E.G. et al. Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis - Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference // Radiology. 2003. Vol. 229, N 2. P. 340-346.

    110. Reutern G.M. Von. Measuring the degree of internal carotid artery stenosis // Perspect. Med. 2012. Vol. 1, N 1-12. P. 104-107.

    111. Arning C. et al. [Revision of DEGUM ultrasound criteria for grading internal carotid artery stenoses and transfer to NASCET measurement] // Ultraschall. Med. 2010. Vol. 31, N 3. P. 251-257.

    112. Henderson R.D. et al. Effect of contralateral carotid artery stenosis on carotid ultrasound velocity measurements // Stroke. 2000. Vol. 31, N 11. P. 2636-2640.

    113. AbuRahma A.F. et al. Effect of contralateral severe stenosis or carotid occlusion on duplex criteria of ipsilateral stenoses: comparative study of various duplex parameters // J. Vasc. Surg. 1995. Vol. 22, N 6. P. 751-762.

    114. Jensen J.A. et al. History and latest advances in flow estimation technology: from 1-D in 2-D to 3-D in 4-D // IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS. Glasgow : IEEE Computer Society, 2019. P. 1041-1050.

    115. Mynard J.P., Steinman D.A. Effect of velocity profile skewing on blood velocity and volume flow waveforms derived from maximum Doppler spectral velocity // Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2013. Vol. 39, N 5. P. 870-881.

    116. Lui E.Y.L. et al. Human factors as a source of error in peak Doppler velocity measurement // J. Vasc. Surg. 2005. Vol. 42, N 5. P. 972.e1-972.e10.

    117. Шумилина М.В. Особенности ультразвуковой диагностики патологии брахиоцефальных артерий в Центре им. А.Н. Бакулева // Бюллетень НЦССХ имени А.Н. Бакулева РАМН. Сердечно-сосудистые заболевания. 2021. Т. 22, № 2. С. 184-194.

    118. Засорин С.В., Куликов В.П., Карпенко А.А. Ультразвуковая оценка каротидных стенозов: методы, возможности и ограничения // Ангиология и сосудистая хирургия. 2012. Т. 18, № 3. С. 33-42.

    119. Kamtchum-Tatuene J. et al. Carotid plaque with high-risk features in embolic stroke of undetermined source: systematic review and meta-analysis // Stroke. 2020. Vol. 51, N 1. P. 311-314.

    120. Brinjikji W. et al. Ultrasound characteristics of symptomatic carotid plaques: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2015. Vol. 40, N 3-4. P. 165-174.

    121. Howard D.P.J., Gaziano L., Rothwell P.M. Risk of stroke in relation to degree of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a population-based cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis // Lancet Neurol. 2021. Vol. 20, N 3. P. 193-202.

    122. Kakkos S.K. et al. Predictors and clinical significance of progression or regression of asymptomatic carotid stenosis // J. Vasc. Surg. 2014. Vol. 59, N 4. P. 956-967.

    123. Hirt L.S. Progression rate and ipsilateral neurological events in asymptomatic carotid stenosis // Stroke. 2014. Vol. 45, N 3. P. 702-706.

    124. Geroulakos G. et al. Characterization of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid plaques using high-resolution real-time ultrasonography // Br. J. Surg. 1993. Vol. 80, N 10. P. 1274-1277.

    125. Gray-Weale A.C. et al. Carotid artery atheroma: comparison of preoperative B-mode ultrasound appearance with carotid endarterectomy specimen pathology // J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino). 1988. Vol. 29, N 6. P. 676-681.

    126. Nicolaides A.N. et al. Asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis and cerebrovascular risk stratification // J. Vasc. Surg. 2010. Vol. 52, N 6. P. 1486.e1-1496.e5.

    127. Jashari F. et al. Carotid plaque echogenicity predicts cerebrovascular symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Eur. J. Neurol. 2016. Vol. 23, N 7. P. 1241-1247.

    128. Gupta A. et al. Plaque echolucency and stroke risk in asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Stroke. 2015. Vol. 46, N 1. P. 91-97.

    129. Kakkos S.K. et al. The size of juxtaluminal hypoechoic area in ultrasound images of asymptomatic carotid plaques predicts the occurrence of stroke // J. Vasc. Surg. 2013. Vol. 57, N 3. P. 609-618.e1.

    130. Mitchell C. et al. Ultrasound carotid plaque features, cardiovascular disease risk factors and events: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis // Atherosclerosis. 2018. Vol. 276. P. 195-202.

    131. Saba L. et al. Imaging of the carotid artery vulnerable plaque // Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 2014. Vol. 37, N 3. P. 572-585.

    132. Ibrahimi P. et al. Vulnerable plaques in the contralateral carotid arteries in symptomatic patients: a detailed ultrasound analysis // Atherosclerosis. 2014. Vol. 235, N 2. P. 526-531.

    133. Artas H., Okcesiz I. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic evaluation of carotid artery plaque surface irregularity // Arch. Med. Sci. 2019. Vol. 16, N 1. P. 58-65.

    134. King A. et al. Does impaired cerebrovascular reactivity predict stroke risk in asymptomatic carotid stenosis? A prospective substudy of the asymptomatic carotid emboli study // Stroke. 2011. Vol. 42, N 6. P. 1550-1555.

    135. Markus H.S. et al. Asymptomatic embolisation for prediction of stroke in the Asymptomatic Carotid Emboli Study (ACES): a prospective observational study // Lancet Neurol. 2010. Vol. 9, N 7. P. 663-671.

    136. Best L.M.J. et al. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound detection of microemboli as a predictor of cerebral events in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2016. Vol. 52, N 5. P. 565-580.

    137. Huang R. et al. Detection of carotid atherosclerotic plaque neovascularization using contrast enhanced ultrasound: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies // J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2016. Vol. 29, N 6. P. 491-502.

    138. Dong S. et al. Diagnostic performance of atherosclerotic carotid plaque neovascularization with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a meta-analysis // Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2022. Vol. 2022. Article ID 7531624.

    139. Sultan S.R. et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid plaques: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Echocardiography. 2022. Vol. 39, N 8. P. 1032-1043.

    140. Берген Т.А. и др. Экспертный консенсус национальных медицинских исследовательских центров по профилю "сердечно-сосудистая хирургия" и Российского общества рентгенологов и радиологов: принципы и технология использования методов лучевой диагностики при патологии брахиоцефальных сосудов // Трансляционная медицина. 2022. Т. 9, № 5. С. 5-19.

    141. Hsieh M.S. et al. Contrast medium exposure during computed tomography and risk of development of end-stage renal disease in patients with chronic kidney disease: a nationwide population-based, propensity score-matched, longitudinal follow-up study // Medicine (Baltimore). 2016. Vol. 95, N 16. Article ID e3388.

    142. Chen C.J. et al. Multi-slice CT angiography in diagnosing total versus near occlusions of the internal carotid artery: comparison with catheter angiography // Stroke. 2004. Vol. 35, N 1. P. 83-85.

    143. Tekieli L. et al. Misclassification of carotid stenosis severity with area stenosis-based evaluation by computed tomography angiography: impact on erroneous indication to revascularization or patient (lesion) migration to a higher guideline recommendation class as per ESC/ESVS/ESO/SVS and CMS-FDA thresholds // Postepy Kardiol. Interwencyjnej. 2022. Vol. 18, N 4. P. 500-513.

    144. Baradaran H. et al. Association between carotid plaque features on CTA and cerebrovascular ischemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis // AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2017. Vol. 38, N 12. P. 2321-2326.

    145. van Dam-Nolen D.H.K. et al. Carotid plaque characteristics predict recurrent ischemic stroke and TIA: the PARISK (Plaque At RISK) study // JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2022. Vol. 15, N 10. P. 1715-1726.

    146. Magge R. et al. Clinical risk factors and CT imaging features of carotid atherosclerotic plaques as predictors of new incident carotid ischemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study // AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2013. Vol. 34, N 2. P. 402-409.

    147. Saba L. et al. Carotid artery wall thickness and ischemic symptoms: evaluation using multi-detector-row CT angiography // Eur. Radiol. 2008. Vol. 18, N 9. P. 1962-1971.

    148. Kwee R.M. Systematic review on the association between calcification in carotid plaques and clinical ischemic symptoms // J. Vasc. Surg. 2010. Vol. 51, N 4. P. 1015-1025.

    149. Homssi M. et al. Extracranial carotid plaque calcification and cerebrovascular ischemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Stroke. 2023. Vol. 54, N 10. P. 2621-2628.

    150. Eisenmenger L.B. et al. Prediction of carotid intraplaque hemorrhage using adventitial calcification and plaque thickness on CTA // AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2016. Vol. 37, N 8. P. 1496-1503.

    151. Hardie A.D. et al. The impact of expansive arterial remodeling on clinical presentation in carotid artery disease: a multidetector CT angiography study // AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2007. Vol. 28, N 6. P. 1067-1070.

    152. Antonopoulos A.S. et al. Detecting human coronary inflammation by imaging perivascular fat // Sci. Transl. Med. 2017. Vol. 9, N 398. Article ID eaal2658.

    153. Baradaran H. et al. Association between carotid artery perivascular fat density and cerebrovascular ischemic events // J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2018. Vol. 7, N 24. Article ID e010383.

    154. Saba L. et al. Perivascular fat density and contrast plaque enhancement: does a correlation exist? // AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2020. Vol. 41, N 8. P. 1460-1465.

    155. Kakkos S.K. et al. Silent embolic infarcts on computed tomography brain scans and risk of ipsilateral hemispheric events in patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis // J. Vasc. Surg. 2009. Vol. 49, N 4. P. 902-909.

    156. DeMarco J.K., Huston J., Bernstein M.A. Evaluation of classic 2D time-of-flight MR angiography in the depiction of severe carotid stenosis // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2004. Vol. 183, N 3. P. 787-793.

    157. Alvarez-Linera J. et al. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography // AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2003. Vol. 24, N 5. P. 1012-1019.

    158. Remonda L. et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography // AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2002. Vol. 23, N 2. P. 213-219.

    159. Dakis K. et al. Carotid plaque vulnerability diagnosis by CTA versus MRA: a systematic review // Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. Vol. 13, N 4. P. 646.

    160. Cowper S.E., Kuo P.H., Bucala R. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and gadolinium exposure: association and lessons for idiopathic fibrosing disorders // Arthritis Rheum. 2007. Vol. 56, N 10. P. 3173-3175.

    161. Saba L. et al. Carotid artery wall imaging: perspective and guidelines from the ASNR vessel wall imaging study group and expert consensus recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology // AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2018. Vol. 39, N 2. P. E9-E31.

    162. Gupta A. et al. Carotid plaque MRI and stroke risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Stroke. 2013. Vol. 44, N 11. P. 3071-3077.

    163. Seyedsaadat S.M. et al. Correlation of MRI-detected vulnerable carotid plaques with clinical presentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Neurosurg. Sci. 2020. Vol. 64, N 3. P. 263-271.

    164. Rizvi A. et al. Carotid plaque vulnerability on magnetic resonance imaging and risk of future ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Neurosurg. Sci. 2020. Vol. 64, N 5. P. 480-486.

    165. Jiang B. et al. Risk prediction of cerebrovascular events with carotid plaque magnetic resonance analysis: a meta-analysis // J. Neuroradiol. 2019. Vol. 46, N 2. P. 117-123.

    166. Stary H.C. et al. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis: a report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association // Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1995. Vol. 15, N 9. P. 1512-1531.

    167. Stary H.C. Natural history and histological classification of atherosclerotic lesions: an update // Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2000. Vol. 20, N 5. P. 1177-1178.

    168. Cai J.M. et al. Classification of human carotid atherosclerotic lesions with in vivo multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging // Circulation. 2002. Vol. 106, N 11. P. 1368-1373.

    169. Hellings W.E. et al. Composition of carotid atherosclerotic plaque is associated with cardiovascular outcome: a prognostic study // Circulation. 2010. Vol. 121, N 17. P. 1941-1950.

    170. Zhou T. et al. Diagnostic performance of MRI for detecting intraplaque hemorrhage in the carotid arteries: a meta-analysis // Eur. Radiol. 2019. Vol. 29, N 10. P. 5129-5138.

    171. Saam T. et al. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the predictive value of carotid plaque hemorrhage on cerebrovascular events by magnetic resonance imaging // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013. Vol. 62, N 12. P. 1081-1091.

    172. Benson J.C. et al. MR imaging of carotid artery atherosclerosis: updated evidence on high-risk plaque features and emerging trends // AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2023. Vol. 44, N 8. P. 880-888.

    173. Brinjikji W. et al. The association between carotid intraplaque hemorrhage and outcomes of carotid stenting: a systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2017. Vol. 9, N 9. P. 837-842.

    174. Li Q. et al. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging for carotid atherosclerotic plaques: a systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Ultrasound Med. 2023. Vol. 42, N 3. P. 739-749.

    175. Debette S., Markus H.S. The clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis // BMJ. 2010. Vol. 341, N 7767. P. c3666.

    176. Shen J. et al. Complications associated with diagnostic cerebral angiography: a retrospective analysis of 644 consecutive cerebral angiographic cases // Neurol. India. 2018. Vol. 66, N 4. P. 1154-1158.

    177. Tafelmeier S. et al. Spectrum of complications and complication rates after diagnostic catheter angiography in neuroradiology // Clin. Neuroradiol. 2023. Vol. 33, N 3. P. 763-768.

    178. Leonardi M. et al. Retrospective study of complications arising during cerebral and spinal diagnostic angiography from 1998 to 2003 // Interv. Neuroradiol. 2005. Vol. 11, N 3. P. 213-221.

    179. Zhang Y. et al. Contrast-induced encephalopathy and permanent neurological deficit following cerebral angiography: a case report and review of the literature // Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2023. Vol. 16. Article ID 1070357.

    180. Tarr R.W. et al. Complications of preoperative balloon test occlusion of the internal carotid arteries: experience in 300 cases // Skull Base Surg. 1991. Vol. 1, N 4. P. 240-244.

    181. Mathis J.M. et al. Temporary balloon test occlusion of the internal carotid artery: experience in 500 cases // AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1995. Vol. 16, N 4. P. 749- 754.

    182. Загаров С.С. и др. Церебральная оксиметрия при выполнении каротидной эндартерэктомии // Ангиология и сосудистая хирургия. 2018. Т. 24, № 3. С. 154.

    183. Dare A.O. et al. Failure of the hypotensive provocative test during temporary balloon test occlusion of the internal carotid artery to predict delayed hemodynamic ischemia after therapeutic carotid occlusion // Surg. Neurol. 1998. Vol. 50, N 2. P. 147-156.

    184. Linskey M.E. et al. Stroke risk after abrupt internal carotid artery sacrifice: accuracy of preoperative assessment with balloon test occlusion and stable xenon-enhanced CT // AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1994. Vol. 15, N 5. P. 829-843.

    185. American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology. Carotid artery balloon test occlusion // AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2001. Vol. 22, N 8 Suppl. P. S8-S9.

    186. Yu E., Malik V.S., Hu F.B. Cardiovascular disease prevention by diet modification: JACC Health Promotion Series // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018. Vol. 72, N 8. P. 914-926.

    187. Ishizaka N. et al. Association between cigarette smoking, metabolic syndrome, and carotid arteriosclerosis in Japanese individuals // Atherosclerosis. 2005. Vol. 181, N 2. P. 381-388.

    188. Kawamoto R. et al. Carotid atherosclerosis in normal-weight metabolic syndrome // Intern. Med. 2007. Vol. 46, N 21. P. 1771-1777.

    189. Irace C. et al. Components of the metabolic syndrome and carotid atherosclerosis: role of elevated blood pressure // Hypertension. 2005. Vol. 45, N 4. P. 597-601.

    190. Strazzullo P. et al. Excess body weight and incidence of stroke // Stroke. 2010. Vol. 41, N 5. P. e418-e426.

    191. Herder M. et al. Risk factors for progression of carotid intima-media thickness and total plaque area // Stroke. 2012. Vol. 43, N 7. P. 1818-1823.

    192. Shinton R., Beevers G. Meta-analysis of relation between cigarette smoking and stroke // BMJ. 1989. Vol. 298, N 6676. P. 789-794.

    193. Lawes C.M.M. et al. Blood pressure and stroke: an overview of published reviews // Stroke. 2004. Vol. 35, N 3. P. 776-785.

    194. Lewington S. et al. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies // Lancet. 2002. Vol. 360, N 9349. P. 1903-1913.

    195. Lee C.D., Folsom A.R., Blair S.N. Physical activity and stroke risk // Stroke. 2003. Vol. 34, N 10. P. 2475-2481.

    196. Cruickshanka J. et al. Meta-analysis of hypertension treatment trials // Lancet. 1990. Vol. 335, N 8697. P. 1092-1094.

    197. Lobelo F. et al. Routine assessment and promotion of physical activity in healthcare settings: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association // Circulation. 2018. Vol. 137, N 18. P. e495-e522.

    198. O’Connor E.A. et al. Behavioral counseling to promote a healthy diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults with cardiovascular risk factors: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force // JAMA. 2020. Vol. 324, N 20. P. 2076-2094.

    199. Adams R.J. et al. Coronary risk evaluation in patients with transient ischemic attack and ischemic stroke // Circulation. 2003. Vol. 108, N 10. P. 1278-1290.

    200. Giannopoulos A. et al. Long-term mortality in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis: Implications for statin therapy // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2015. Vol. 50, N 5. P. 573-582.

    201. Collins R. et al. Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials // Lancet. 2009. Vol. 373, N 9678. P. 1849-1860.

    202. Murphy S.J.X. et al. Optimal antiplatelet therapy in moderate to severe asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis: a comprehensive review of the literature // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2019. Vol. 57, N 2. P. 199-211.

    203. Diener H.C. et al. European Stroke Prevention Study. 2. Dipyridamole and acetylsalicylic acid in the secondary prevention of stroke // J. Neurol. Sci. 1996. Vol. 143, N 1-2. P. 1-13.

    204. King A., Shipley M., Markus H. The effect of medical treatments on stroke risk in asymptomatic carotid stenosis // Stroke. 2013. Vol. 44, N 2. P. 542-546.

    205. Taylor D.W. et al. Low-dose and high-dose acetylsalicylic acid for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: a randomised controlled trial // Lancet. 1999. Vol. 353, N 9171. P. 2179-2184.

    206. Mannheim D., Karmeli R. A prospective randomized trial comparing endarterectomy to stenting in severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis // J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino). 2017. Vol. 58, N 6. P. 814-817.

    207. Gurm H.S. et al. Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients // N. Engl. J. Med. 2008. Vol. 358, N 15. P. 1572-1579.

    208. Rosenfield K. et al. Randomized trial of stent versus surgery for asymptomatic carotid stenosis // N. Engl. J. Med. 2016. Vol. 374, N 11. P. 1011-1020.

    209. Eckstein H.H. et al. SPACE-2: a missed opportunity to compare carotid endarterectomy, carotid stenting, and best medical treatment in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenoses // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2016. Vol. 51, N 6. P. 761-765.

    210. Quinn M.J., Fitzgerald D.J. Ticlopidine and clopidogrel // Circulation. 1999. Vol. 100, N 15. P. 1667-1672.

    211. Brott T.G. et al. Long-term results of stenting versus endarterectomy for carotid-artery stenosis // N. Engl. J. Med. 2016. Vol. 374, N 11. P. 1021-1031.

    212. McKevitt F.M. et al. The benefits of combined anti-platelet treatment in carotid artery stenting // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2005. Vol. 29, N 5. P. 522-527.

    213. Eikelboom J.W. et al. Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in stable cardiovascular disease // N. Engl. J. Med. 2017. Vol. 377, N 14. P. 1319-1330.

    214. Anand S.S. et al. Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in patients with stable peripheral or carotid artery disease: an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial // Lancet. 2018. Vol. 391, N 10 117. P. 219-229.

    215. Bosch J. et al. Rationale, design and baseline characteristics of participants in the cardiovascular outcomes for people using anticoagulation strategies (COMPASS) trial // Can. J. Cardiol. 2017. Vol. 33, N 8. P. 1027-1035.

    216. Halliday A. et al. 10-year stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (ACST-1): a multicentre randomised trial // Lancet. 2010. Vol. 376, N 9746. P. 1074-1084.

    217. Mihaylova B. et al. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials // Lancet. 2012. Vol. 380, N 9841. P. 581-590.

    218. Zhan S. et al. Ezetimibe for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality events // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018. Vol. 11, № 11. CD012502.

    219. Ogata A. et al. Stabilization of vulnerable carotid plaques with proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor alirocumab // Acta. Neurochir. (Wien). 2019. Vol. 161, N 3. P. 597-600.

    220. Schmidt A.F. et al. PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2020. Vol. 10, N 10. CD011748.

    221. Giugliano R.P. et al. Stroke prevention with the PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9) inhibitor evolocumab added to statin in high-risk patients with stable atherosclerosis // Stroke. 2020. Vol. 51, N 5. P. 1546-1554.

    222. Mathiesen E.B., Joakimsen O., Bonaa K.H. Prevalence of and risk factors associated with carotid artery stenosis: the Tromso Study // Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2001. Vol. 12, N 1. P. 44-51.

    223. Sutton-Tyrrell K., Wolfson S.K., Kuller L.H. Blood pressure treatment slows the progression of carotid stenosis in patients with isolated systolic hypertension // Stroke. 1994. Vol. 25, № 1. P. 44-50.

    224. Huo Y. et al. Efficacy of folic acid therapy in primary prevention of stroke among adults with hypertension in China: the CSPPT randomized clinical trial // JAMA. 2015. Vol. 313, N 13. P. 1325-1335.

    225. Williams B. et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension // Eur. Heart J., 2018. Vol. 39, N 33. P. 3021-3104.

    226. Banerjee C. et al. Duration of diabetes and risk of ischemic stroke: the Northern Manhattan Study // Stroke. 2012. Vol. 43, N 5. P. 1212-1217.

    227. Scholtes V.P.W. et al. Type 2 diabetes is not associated with an altered plaque phenotype among patients undergoing carotid revascularization. A histological analysis of 1455 carotid plaques // Atherosclerosis. 2014. Vol. 235, N 2. P. 418-423.

    228. Gaede P. et al. Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes // N. Engl. J. Med. 2008. Vol. 358, N 6. P. 580-591.

    229. Zhang C. et al. Efficacy of intensive control of glucose in stroke prevention: a meta-analysis of data from 59,197 participants in 9 randomized controlled trials // PLoS One. 2013. Vol. 8, N 1. Article ID e54465.

    230. Wilcox R., Kupfer S., Erdmann E. Effects of pioglitazone on major adverse cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes: results from PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macro Vascular Events (PROactive 10) // Am. Heart J. 2008. Vol. 155, N 4. P. 712-717.

    231. NICE Guideline. Overview. Type 2 Diabetes in Adults: Management. London : National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), 2022.

    232. NICE Guideline. Overview. Type 1 Diabetes in Adults: Diagnosis and Management. London : National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), 2022.

    233. Feldman H. et al. Standards of Care in Diabetes - 2023 Abridged for Primary Care Providers // Clin. Diabetes. 2023. Vol. 41, N 1. P. 4-31.

    234. Karalliedde J. et al. Clinical practice guidelines for management of hyperglycaemia in adults with diabetic kidney disease // Diabet. Med. 2022. Vol. 39, N 4. Article ID e14769.

    235. Kirkpatrick A.C. et al. Cognitive impairment is associated with medication nonadherence in asymptomatic carotid stenosis // Am. J. Med. 2014. Vol. 127, N 12. P. 1243-1246.

    236. Osterberg L., Blaschke T. Adherence to medication // Pediatriya. 2005. Vol. 55, N 2. P. 68-69.

    237. Luebke T., Brunkwall J. Development of a microsimulation model to predict stroke and long-term mortality in adherent and nonadherent medically managed and surgically treated octogenarians with asymptomatic significant carotid artery stenosis // World Neurosurg. 2016. Vol. 92. P. 513-520.e2.

    238. Sandercock P.A.G. The International Stroke Trial (IST): a randomised trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both, or neither among 19 435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke // Lancet. 1997. Vol. 349, N 9065. P. 1569-1581.

    239. Chen Z.M. CAST: randomised placebo-controlled trial of early aspirin use in 20,000 patients with acute ischaemic stroke // Lancet. 1997. Vol. 349, N 9066. P. 1641-1649.

    240. Hankey G.J. Antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of recurrent stroke and other serious vascular events: a review of the clinical trial data and guidelines // Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2007. Vol. 23, N 6. P. 1453-1462.

    241. Sandercock P. Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin in acute ischaemic stroke // Thromb. Haemost. 1997. Vol. 78, N 1. P. 180-182.

    242. Lindblad B. et al. Does low-dose acetylsalicylic acid prevent stroke after carotid surgery? A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial // Stroke. 1993. Vol. 24, N 8. P. 1125-1128.

    243. Gent M. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE) // Lancet. 1996. Vol. 348, N 9038. P. 1329-1339.

    244. Savcic M. et al. Clopidogrel loading dose regimens: kinetic profile of pharmacodynamic response in healthy subjects // Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 1999. Vol. 25. Suppl. 2. P. 15-19.

    245. Sacco R.L. et al. Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke // N. Engl. J. Med. 2008. Vol. 359, N 12. P. 1238-1251.

    246. Johnston S.C. et al. Ticagrelor versus aspirin in acute stroke or transient ischemic attack // N. Engl. J. Med. 2016. Vol. 375, N 1. P. 35-43.

    247. Amarenco P. et al. Efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus aspirin in acute stroke or transient ischaemic attack of atherosclerotic origin: a subgroup analysis of SOCRATES, a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial // Lancet Neurol. 2017. Vol. 16, N 4. P. 301-310.

    248. Dengler R. et al. Early treatment with aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole for transient ischaemic attack or ischaemic stroke within 24 h of symptom onset (EARLY trial): a randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial // Lancet Neurol. 2010. Vol. 9, N 2. P. 159-166.

    249. Halkes P. et al. Aspirin plus dipyridamole versus aspirin alone after cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin (ESPRIT): randomised controlled trial // Lancet. 2006. Vol. 367, N 9523. P. 1665-1673.

    250. Hao Q. et al. Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone for acute minor ischaemic stroke or high risk transient ischaemic attack: systematic review and meta-analysis // BMJ. 2018. Vol. 363. P. k5108.

    251. King A., Markus H.S. Doppler embolic signals in cerebrovascular disease and prediction of stroke risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Stroke. 2009. Vol. 40, N 12. P. 3711-3717.

    252. King A., Bath P.M.W., Markus H.S. Clopidogrel versus dipyridamole in addition to aspirin in reducing embolization detected with ambulatory transcranial Doppler: a randomized trial // Stroke. 2011. Vol. 42, N 3. P. 650-655.

    253. Amarenco P. et al. Ticagrelor added to aspirin in acute nonsevere ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack of atherosclerotic origin // Stroke. 2020. Vol. 51, N 12. P. 3504-3513.

    254. Markus H.S. et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin in symptomatic carotid stenosis evaluated using doppler embolic signal detection: the Clopidogrel and Aspirin for Reduction of Emboli in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis (CARESS) trial // Circulation. 2005. Vol. 111, N 17. P. 2233-2240.

    255. Naylor A.R. et al. Closing the loop: a 21-year audit of strategies for preventing stroke and death following carotid endarterectomy // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2013. Vol. 46, N 2. P. 161-170.

    256. Payne D.A. et al. Beneficial effects of clopidogrel combined with aspirin in reducing cerebral emboli in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy // Circulation. 2004. Vol. 109, N 12. P. 1476-1481.

    257. Dawson J. et al. European Stroke Organisation expedited recommendation for the use of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy early after minor stroke and high-risk TIA // Eur. Stroke J. 2021. Vol. 6, N 2. P. CLXXXVII-CXCI.

    258. Prasad K. et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel for acute high risk transient ischaemic attack and minor ischaemic stroke: a clinical practice guideline // BMJ. 2018. Vol. 363. P. k5130.

    259. Clinical Guidelines. Stroke Foundation - Australia [Electronic resource]. URL: https://strokefoundation.org.au/what-we-do/for-health-professionals/clinical-guidelines (date of access May 04, 2024).

    260. Boulanger J.M. et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations for acute stroke management: prehospital, emergency department, and acute inpatient stroke care, 6th edition, update 2018 // Int. J. Stroke. 2018. Vol. 13, N 9. P. 949-984.

    261. Kleindorfer D.O. et al. 2021 guideline for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association // Stroke. 2021. Vol. 52, N 7. P. E364-E467.

    262. Batchelder A. et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy prior to expedited carotid surgery reduces recurrent events prior to surgery without significantly increasing peri-operative bleeding complications // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2015. Vol. 50, N 4. P. 412-419.

    263. Diener P.H.C. et al. Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial // Lancet. 2004. Vol. 364, N 9431. P. 331-337.

    264. Brott T.G. et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis // N. Engl. J. Med. 2010. Vol. 363, N 1. P. 11-23.

    265. Mas J.L. Endarterectomy vs angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) Trial // Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2004. Vol. 18, N 1. P. 62-65.

    266. Eckstein H.H. et al. Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial // Lancet Neurol. 2008. Vol. 7, N 10. P. 893-902.

    267. Bonati L.H. et al. Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial // Lancet. 2015. Vol. 385, N 9967. P. 529-538.

    268. NICE. Scenario: Secondary prevention following stroke and TIA [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.nice.org.uk/cks-uk-only (date of access May 04, 2024).

    269. Bhatt D.L. et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events // N. Engl. J. Med. 2006. Vol. 354, N 16. P. 1706-1717.

    270. Benavente O. et al. Effects of clopidogrel added to aspirin in patients with recent lacunar stroke // N. Engl. J. Med. 2012. Vol. 367, N 9. P. 817-825.

    271. Kakkos S.K. et al. Editor’s choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2021 clinical practice guidelines on the management of venous thrombosis // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2021. Vol. 61, N 1. P. 9-82.

    272. Doherty J.U. et al. 2017 ACC expert consensus decision pathway for periprocedural management of anticoagulation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document Task Force // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017. Vol. 69, N 7. P. 871-898.

    273. Hindricks G. et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): the Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC // Eur. Heart J. 2021. Vol. 42, N 5. P. 373-498.

    274. Pisters R. et al. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey // Chest. 2010. Vol. 138, N 5. P. 1093-1100.

    275. Douketis J.D. et al. Perioperative bridging anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation // N. Engl. J. Med. 2015. Vol. 373, N 9. P. 823-833.

    276. Jones D.W. et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy reduces stroke but increases bleeding at the time of carotid endarterectomy // J. Vasc. Surg. 2016. Vol. 63, N 5. P. 1262-1270.e3.

    277. Steffel J. et al. The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association practical guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation // Eur. Heart J. 2018. Vol. 39, N 16. P. 1330-1393.

    278. Batchelder A.J., Saratzis A., Ross Naylor A. Editor’s choice - overview of primary and secondary analyses from 20 randomised controlled trials comparing carotid artery stenting with carotid endarterectomy // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2019. Vol. 58, N 4. P. 479-493.

    279. Sorrentino S. et al. Standard versus ultrasound-guided cannulation of the femoral artery in patients undergoing invasive procedures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials // J. Clin. Med. 2020. Vol. 9, N 3. P. 677.

    280. Patel I.J. et al. Society of Interventional Radiology consensus guidelines for the periprocedural management of thrombotic and bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous image-guided interventions-part ii: recommendations: endorsed by the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe // J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2019. Vol. 30, N 8. P. 1168-1184.e1.

    281. Gaglia M.A. et al. Relation of proton pump inhibitor use after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents to outcomes // Am. J. Cardiol. 2010. Vol. 105, N 6. P. 833-838.

    282. Brooks W.H. et al. Carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: randomized trial in a community hospital // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2001. Vol. 38, N 6. P. 1589-1595.

    283. Chan F.K.L. et al. Similar efficacy of proton-pump inhibitors vs H2-receptor antagonists in reducing risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding or ulcers in high-risk users of low-dose aspirin // Gastroenterology. 2017. Vol. 152, N 1. P. 105-110.e1.

    284. Furuta T., Iwaki T., Umemura K. Influences of different proton pump inhibitors on the anti-platelet function of clopidogrel in relation to CYP2C19 genotypes // Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2010. Vol. 70, N 3. P. 383-392.

    285. Collet J.P. et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation // Eur. Heart J. 2021. Vol. 42, N 14. P. 1289-1367.

    286. Arbel Y. et al. Platelet inhibitory effect of clopidogrel in patients treated with omeprazole, pantoprazole, and famotidine: a prospective, randomized, crossover study // Clin. Cardiol. 2013. Vol. 36, N 6. P. 342-346.

    287. Sillesen H. et al. Atorvastatin reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with carotid atherosclerosis: a secondary analysis of the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial // Stroke. 2008. Vol. 39, N 12. P. 3297-3302.

    288. Amarenco P. et al. Carotid Atherosclerosis evolution when targeting a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration <70 mg/dL after an ischemic stroke of atherosclerotic origin // Circulation. 2020. Vol. 142, N 8. P. 748-757.

    289. Blanco M. et al. Statin treatment withdrawal in ischemic stroke: a controlled randomized study // Neurology. 2007. Vol. 69, N 9. P. 904-910.

    290. Texakalidis P. et al. Preoperative use of statins in carotid artery stenting: a systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Endovasc. Ther. 2018. Vol. 25, N 5. P. 624-631.

    291. Texakalidis P. et al. Outcome of carotid artery endarterectomy in statin users versus statin-naïve patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis // World Neurosurg. 2018. Vol. 116. P. 444-450.e1.

    292. Safouris A. et al. Statin pretreatment and microembolic signals in large artery atherosclerosis // Stroke. 2018. Vol. 49, N 8. P. 1992-1995.

    293. Collins R. et al. Effects of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin on stroke and other major vascular events in 20 536 people with cerebrovascular disease or other high-risk conditions // Lancet. 2004. Vol. 363, N 9411. P. 757-767.

    294. Amarenco P. et al. A Comparison of two LDL cholesterol targets after ischemic stroke // N. Engl. J. Med. 2020. Vol. 382, N 1. P. 9-19.

    295. Bond R. et al. Clinical and radiographic risk factors for operative stroke and death in the European Carotid Surgery Trial // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2002. Vol. 23, N 2. P. 108-116.

    296. Rothwell P.M., Howard S.C., Spence J.D. Relationship between blood pressure and stroke risk in patients with symptomatic carotid occlusive disease // Stroke. 2003. Vol. 34, N 11. P. 2583-2590.

    297. Paraskevas K.I. et al. Editor’s choice - asymptomatic carotid stenosis and cognitive impairment: a systematic review // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2021. Vol. 61, N 6. P. 888-899.

    298. Ancetti S. et al. Editor’s choice - effect of carotid interventions on cognitive function in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a systematic review // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2021. Vol. 62, N 5. P. 684-694.

    299. Национальные рекомендации по ведению пациентов с заболеваниями брахиоцефальных артерий. Москва, 2013.

    300. Chang R.W. et al. A comparative effectiveness study of carotid intervention for long-term stroke prevention in patients with severe asymptomatic stenosis from a large integrated health system // J. Vasc. Surg. 2023. Vol. 78, N 5. P. 1239-1247.e4.

    301. Abbott A.L. et al. Misconceptions regarding the adequacy of best medical intervention alone for asymptomatic carotid stenosis // J. Vasc. Surg. 2020. Vol. 71, N 1. P. 257-269.

    302. Abbott A.L. Management of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis may need to be individualized: a multidisciplinary call for action // J. Stroke. 2022. Vol. 24, N 1. P. 160-162.

    303. Halliday A. et al.; MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative Group. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms [Electronic resource] // Lancet. 2004. Vol. 363, N 9420. P. 1491-1502. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/ (date of access May 06, 2024).

    304. Hobson R.W. et al. Efficacy of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group // N. Engl. J. Med. 1993. Vol. 328, N 4. P. 221-227.

    305. Nicolaides A.N. et al. Severity of asymptomatic carotid stenosis and risk of ipsilateral hemispheric ischaemic events: results from the ACSRS study // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2005. Vol. 30, N 3. P. 275-284.

    306. Yadav J.S. et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients // N. Engl. J. Med. 2004. Vol. 351, N 15. P. 1493-1501.

    307. Ad N. et al. Comparison of EuroSCORE II, Original EuroSCORE, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score in cardiac surgery patients // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2016. Vol. 102, N 2. P. 573-579.

    308. Nashef S.A.M. et al. EuroSCORE II // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2012. Vol. 41, N 4. P. 734-745.

    309. Biller J. et al. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a statement for healthcare professionals from a Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association // Circulation. 1998. Vol. 97, N 5. P. 501-509.

    310. Eckstein H. et al. S3-leitlinie zurdiagnostik, therapie und nachsorge der extracraniellen carotisstenose, langfassung, kurzfassung undleitlinienreport. 2020. URL: https://register.awmf.org/assets/guidelines/004-028l_extracranielle-Carotisstenose-Diagnostik-Therapie-Nachsorge_2020-02_03.pdf

    311. Hill M.D. et al. Stroke after carotid stenting and endarterectomy in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) // Circulation. 2012. Vol. 126, N 25. P. 3054-3061.

    312. Munster A.B. et al. Temporal trends in safety of carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients: systematic review // Neurology. 2015. Vol. 85, N 4. P. 365-372.

    313. Schneider P.A., Naylor A.R. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis--medical therapy alone versus medical therapy plus carotid endarterectomy or stenting // J. Vasc. Surg. 2010. Vol. 52, N 2. P. 499-507.

    314. Cambria R.P., Conrad M.F. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis: Revisionist history is usually wrong // J. Vasc. Surg. 2020. Vol. 71, N 1. P. 2-4.

    315. Silver F.L. et al. Safety of stenting and endarterectomy by symptomatic status in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST) // Stroke. 2011. Vol. 42, N 3. P. 675-680.

    316. Vasavada A.M. et al. Carotid endarterectomy versus stenting for the treatment of patients with carotid artery stenosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis // Cureus. 2023. Vol. 15, N 2.

    317. Halliday A. et al. Second asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST-2): a randomised comparison of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy // Lancet. 2021. Vol. 398, N 10 305. P. 1065-1073.

    318. Karotis-Revaskularisation (QS KAROTIS) - IQTIG [Electronic resource]. URL: https://iqtig.org/qs-verfahren/qs-karotis/ (date of access May 06, 2024).

    319. Topakian R. et al. Ultrasonic plaque echolucency and emboli signals predict stroke in asymptomatic carotid stenosis // Neurology. 2011. Vol. 77, N 8. P. 751-758.

    320. Dementia Statistics Hub. Alzheimer’s Research UK [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.dementiastatistics.org/ (date of access May 06, 2024).

    321. Chang X.L. et al. Association between asymptomatic carotid stenosis and cognitive function: a systematic review // Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2013. Vol. 37, N 8. P. 1493-1499.

    322. Buratti L. et al. Cognitive deterioration in bilateral asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis // Stroke. 2014. Vol. 45, N 7. P. 2072-2077.

    323. Silvestrini M. et al. The role of carotid atherosclerosis in Alzheimer’s disease progression // J. Alzheimers Dis. 2011. Vol. 25, N 4. P. 719-726.

    324. Balucani C. et al. Cerebral hemodynamics and cognitive performance in bilateral asymptomatic carotid stenosis // Neurology. 2012. Vol. 79, N 17. P. 1788-1795.

    325. Buratti L. et al. Thresholds of impaired cerebral hemodynamics that predict short-term cognitive decline in asymptomatic carotid stenosis // J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2016. Vol. 36, N 10. P. 1804-1812.

    326. Balestrini S. et al. Severe carotid stenosis and impaired cerebral hemodynamics can influence cognitive deterioration // Neurology. 2013. Vol. 80, N 23. P. 2145-2150.

    327. Chen Y.H. et al. Carotid stenting improves cognitive function in asymptomatic cerebral ischemia // Int. J. Cardiol. 2012. Vol. 157, N 1. P. 104-107.

    328. Halliday A. et al. Editor’s choice - effect of carotid endarterectomy on 20 year incidence of recorded dementia: a randomised trial // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2022. Vol. 63, N 4. P. 535-545.

    329. Mayberg M. et al. Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of cerebral ischemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis // JAMA. 1991. Vol. 266, N 23. P. 3289-3294.

    330. Barnett H. et al. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis // N. Engl. J. Med. 1991. Vol. 325, N 7. P. 445-453.

    331. Naylor A.R. Time is brain! // Surgeon. 2007. Vol. 5, N 1. P. 23-30.

    332. Чернявский М.А. и др. Российский консенсус по диагностике и лечению пациентов со стенозом сонных артерий // Российский кардиологический журнал. 2022. Т. 27, № 11. С. 76-86.

    333. Rothwell P.M. et al. Sex difference in the effect of time from symptoms to surgery on benefit from carotid endarterectomy for transient ischemic attack and nondisabling stroke // Stroke. 2004. Vol. 35, N 12. P. 2855-2861.

    334. Rothwell P.M. et al. Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis // Lancet. 2003. Vol. 361, N 9352. P. 107-116.

    335. Rothwell P.M. et al. Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and timing of surgery // Lancet. 2004. Vol. 363, N 9413. P. 915-924.

    336. Fokkema M. et al. Stenting versus surgery in patients with carotid stenosis after previous cervical radiation therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis // Stroke. 2012. Vol. 43, N 3. P. 793-801.

    337. Meershoek A.J.A. et al. Carotid endarterectomy in patients with recurrent symptoms associated with an ipsilateral carotid artery near occlusion with full collapse // J. Neurol. 2018. Vol. 265, N 8. P. 1900-1905.

    338. Poppe A.Y. et al. Tandem carotid lesions in acute ischemic stroke: mechanisms, therapeutic challenges, and future directions // AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2020. Vol. 41, N 7. P. 1142-1148.

    339. Phillips P. et al. Systematic review of carotid artery procedures and the volume-outcome relationship in Europe // Br. J. Surg. 2017. Vol. 104, N 10. P. 1273-1283.

    340. AbuRahma A.F. et al. The effect of surgeon’s specialty and volume on the perioperative outcome of carotid endarterectomy // J. Vasc. Surg. 2013. Vol. 58, N 3. P. 666-672.

    341. Giurgius M. et al. The Relationship between carotid revascularization procedural volume and perioperative outcomes in Australia and New Zealand // Angiology. 2021. Vol. 72, N 8. P. 715-723.

    342. Killeen S.D. et al. Provider volume and outcomes for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, carotid endarterectomy, and lower extremity revascularization procedures // J. Vasc. Surg. 2007. Vol. 45, N 3. P. 615-626.

    343. Hussain M.A. et al. Association between operator specialty and outcomes after carotid artery revascularization // J. Vasc. Surg. 2018. Vol. 67, N 2. P. 478-489.e6.

    344. Johal A.S. et al. Changing patterns of carotid endarterectomy between 2011 and 2017 in england: a population-based cohort study // Stroke. 2019. Vol. 50, N 9. P. 2461-2468.

    345. Varty K. et al. The Provision of Services for Patients with Vascular Disease. Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 2015. 39 p.

    346. Hung C.S. et al. Impact of hospital volume on long-term neurological outcome in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting // Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2017. Vol. 89, N 7. P. 1242-1249.

    347. Badheka A.O. et al. Impact of symptoms, gender, co-morbidities, and operator volume on outcome of carotid artery stenting (from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample [2006 to 2010]) // Am. J. Cardiol. 2014. Vol. 114, N 6. P. 933-941.

    348. Gray W.A. et al. The CAPTURE registry: results of carotid stenting with embolic protection in the post approval setting // Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2007. Vol. 69, N 3. P. 341-348.

    349. Nallamothu B.K. et al. Operator experience and carotid stenting outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries // JAMA. 2011. Vol. 306, N 12. P. 1338-1343.

    350. Setacci C. et al. Siena carotid artery stenting score: a risk modelling study for individual patients // Stroke. 2010. Vol. 41, N 6. P. 1259-1265.

    351. Calvet D. et al. Carotid stenting: is there an operator effect? A pooled analysis from the carotid stenting trialists’ collaboration // Stroke. 2014. Vol. 45, N 2. P. 527-532.

    352. Aronow H.D. et al. SCAI/SVM expert consensus statement on carotid stenting: training and credentialing for carotid stenting // Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2016. Vol. 87, N 2. P. 188-199.

    353. Shishehbor M.H. et al. Experience and outcomes with carotid artery stenting: an analysis of the CHOICE study (Carotid Stenting for High Surgical-Risk Patients; Evaluating Outcomes Through the Collection of Clinical Evidence) // JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2014. Vol. 7, N 11. P. 1307-1317.

    354. Brott T.G. et al. Long-term outcomes of stenting and endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a preplanned pooled analysis of individual patient data // Lancet Neurol. 2019. Vol. 18, N 4. P. 348-356.

    355. Howard G. et al. Association between age and risk of stroke or death from carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting: a meta-analysis of pooled patient data from four randomised trials // Lancet. 2016. Vol. 387, N 10 025. P. 1305-1311.

    356. Sardar P. et al. Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for stroke prevention: a meta-analysis of clinical trials // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017. Vol. 69, N 18. P. 2266-2275.

    357. Ederle J. et al. Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial // Lancet. 2010. Vol. 375, N 9719. P. 985-997.

    358. Halvorsen S. et al. 2022 ESC guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery // Eur. Heart J. 2022. Vol. 43, N 39. P. 3826-3924.

    359. Schermerhorn M.L. et al. The impact of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services high-risk criteria on outcome after carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in the SVS Vascular Registry // J. Vasc. Surg. 2013. Vol. 57, N 5. P. 1318-1324.

    360. Gates L. et al. Characteristics that define high risk in carotid endarterectomy from the Vascular Study Group of New England // J. Vasc. Surg. 2015. Vol. 62, N 4. P. 929-936.

    361. Droz N.M. et al. Carotid endarterectomy remains safe in high-risk patients // J. Vasc. Surg. 2021. Vol. 73, N 5. P. 1675-1682.e4.

    362. Simonian G.T. et al. Mandibular subluxation for distal internal carotid exposure: technical considerations // J. Vasc. Surg. 1999. Vol. 30, N 6. P. 1116-1120.

    363. Алекян Б.Г. и др. Непосредственные и отдаленные результаты стентирования и каротидной эндартерэктомии у пациентов с атеросклеротическим поражением внутренней сонной артерии // Эндоваскулярная хирургия. 2024. Т. 8, № 1. С. 27-36.

    364. Faggioli G. et al. Measurement and impact of proximal and distal tortuosity in carotid stenting procedures // J. Vasc. Surg. 2007. Vol. 46, N 6. P. 1119-1124.

    365. Bonati L.H., Fraedrich G. Age modifies the relative risk of stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis--a pooled analysis of EVA-3S, SPACE and ICSS // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2011. Vol. 41, N 2. P. 153-158.

    366. Texakalidis P. et al. Carotid artery endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting for restenosis after carotid artery endarterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis // World Neurosurg. 2018. Vol. 115. P. 421-429.e1.

    367. Kokkinidis D.G. et al. Presence of contralateral carotid occlusion is associated with increased periprocedural stroke risk following CEA but Not CAS: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of 43 studies and 96,658 patients // J. Endovasc. Ther. 2020. Vol. 27, N 2. P. 334-344.

    368. Nejim B. et al. Carotid artery revascularization in patients with contralateral carotid artery occlusion: stent or endarterectomy? // J. Vasc. Surg. 2017. Vol. 66, N 6. P. 1735-1748.e1.

    369. Macdonald S. et al. Towards safer carotid artery stenting: a scoring system for anatomic suitability // Stroke. 2009. Vol. 40, N 5. P. 1698-1703.

    370. Werner M. et al. Anatomic variables contributing to a higher periprocedural incidence of stroke and TIA in carotid artery stenting: single center experience of 833 consecutive cases // Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2012. Vol. 80, N 2. P. 321-328.

    371. de Waard D.D. et al. Diastolic blood pressure is a risk factor for peri-procedural stroke following carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2017. Vol. 53, N 5. P. 626-631.

    372. Moore W.S. et al. Carotid angiographic characteristics in the CREST trial were major contributors to periprocedural stroke and death differences between carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy // J. Vasc. Surg. 2016. Vol. 63, N 4. P. 851-858.e1.

    373. Doig D. et al. Carotid anatomy does not predict the risk of new ischaemic brain lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging after carotid artery stenting in the ICSS-MRI substudy // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2016. Vol. 51, N 1. P. 14-20.

    374. Müller M.D. et al. Vascular anatomy predicts the risk of cerebral ischemia in patients randomized to carotid stenting versus endarterectomy // Stroke. 2017. Vol. 48, N 5. P. 1285-1292.

    375. Johansson E. et al. Recurrent stroke in symptomatic carotid stenosis awaiting revascularization: a pooled analysis // Neurology. 2016. Vol. 86, N 6. P. 498-504.

    376. Tsantilas P. et al. Stroke risk in the early period after carotid related symptoms: a systematic review // J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino). 2015. Vol. 56, N 6. P. 845-852.

    377. Purroy F. et al. Patterns and predictors of early risk of recurrence after transient ischemic attack with respect to etiologic subtypes // Stroke. 2007. Vol. 38, N 12. P. 3225-3229.

    378. Ois A. et al. High risk of early neurological recurrence in symptomatic carotid stenosis // Stroke. 2009. Vol. 40, N 8. P. 2727-2731.

    379. Bonifati D.M. et al. Carotid stenosis as predictor of stroke after transient ischemic attacks // J. Neurol. Sci. 2011. Vol. 303, N 1-2. P. 85-89.

    380. Johansson E.P., Arnerlöv C., Wester P. Risk of recurrent stroke before carotid endarterectomy: the ANSYSCAP study // Int. J. Stroke. 2013. Vol. 8, N 4. P. 220-227.

    381. Mono M.L. et al. Risk of very early recurrent cerebrovascular events in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis // J. Neurosurg. 2013. Vol. 119, N 6. P. 1620-1626.

    382. Merwick Á. et al. Reduction in early stroke risk in carotid stenosis with transient ischemic attack associated with statin treatment // Stroke. 2013. Vol. 44, N 10. P. 2814-2820.

    383. Marnane M. et al. Plaque inflammation and unstable morphology are associated with early stroke recurrence in symptomatic carotid stenosis // Stroke. 2014. Vol. 45, N 3. P. 801-806.

    384. Kjorstad K.E. et al. Editor’s choice - the National Norwegian Carotid Study: time from symptom onset to surgery is too long, resulting in additional neurological events // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2017. Vol. 54, N 4. P. 415-422.

    385. Kuhrij L.S. et al. Factors associated with hospital dependent delay to carotid endarterectomy in the Dutch Audit for Carotid Interventions // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2019. Vol. 58, N 4. P. 495-501.

    386. Tsantilas P. et al. Short time interval between neurologic event and carotid surgery is not associated with an increased procedural risk // Stroke. 2016. Vol. 47, N 11. P. 2783-2790.

    387. Strömberg S. et al. Very urgent carotid endarterectomy confers increased procedural risk // Stroke. 2012. Vol. 43, N 5. P. 1331-1335.

    388. Loftus I.M. et al. Editor’s choice - delays to surgery and procedural risks following carotid endarterectomy in the UK National Vascular Registry // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2016. Vol. 52, N 4. P. 438-443.

    389. Coelho A. et al. Editor’s choice - timing of carotid intervention in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2022. Vol. 63, N 1. P. 3-23.

    390. De Rango P. et al. Summary of Evidence on early carotid intervention for recently symptomatic stenosis based on meta-analysis of current risks // Stroke. 2015. Vol. 46, N 12. P. 3423-3436.

    391. Villwock M.R. et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy and the impact of ultra-early revascularization for emergent admissions of carotid artery stenosis // J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2014. Vol. 23, N 9. P. 2341-2349.

    392. Rerkasem K., Rothwell P.M. Systematic review of the operative risks of carotid endarterectomy for recently symptomatic stenosis in relation to the timing of surgery // Stroke. 2009. Vol. 40, N 10. P. e564-e572.

    393. Tsantilas P. et al. Risk of stroke or death is associated with the timing of carotid artery stenting for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a secondary data analysis of the German Statutory Quality Assurance Database // J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2018. Vol. 7, N 7. Article ID e007983.

    394. Tanious A. et al. Timing of carotid endarterectomy after stroke: retrospective review of prospectively collected national database // Ann. Surg. 2018. Vol. 268, N 3. P. 449-456.

    395. Rantner B. et al. American Society of Anesthesiology and Rankin as predictive parameters for the outcome of carotid endarterectomy within 28 days after an ischemic stroke // J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2006. Vol. 15, N 3. P. 114-120.

    396. Wölfle K.D. et al. Early carotid endarterectomy in patients with a nondisabling ischemic stroke: results of a retrospective analysis // Vasa. 2004. Vol. 33, N 1. P. 30-35.

    397. Strömberg S. et al. Risk of early recurrent stroke in symptomatic carotid stenosis // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2015. Vol. 49, N 2. P. 137-144.

    398. Rantner B. et al. Early endarterectomy carries a lower procedural risk than early stenting in patients with symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery: results from 4 randomized controlled trials // Stroke. 2017. Vol. 48, N 6. P. 1580-1587.

    399. Rantner B. et al. The risk of carotid artery stenting compared with carotid endarterectomy is greatest in patients treated within 7 days of symptoms // J. Vasc. Surg. 2013. Vol. 57, N 3. P. 619-626.e2.

    400. Bhatti A.F. et al. Free-floating thrombus of the carotid artery: literature review and case reports // J. Vasc. Surg. 2007. Vol. 45, N 1. P. 199-205.

    401. Yoshida K. et al. Carotid endarterectomy for medical therapy-resistant symptomatic low-grade stenosis // World Neurosurg. 2019. Vol. 123. P. e543-e548.

    402. Kashiwazaki D. et al. Efficacy of carotid endarterectomy for mild (<50%) symptomatic carotid stenosis with unstable plaque // World Neurosurg. 2019. Vol. 121. P. e60-e69.

    403. Karlsson L. et al. Risk of recurrent stroke in patients with symptomatic mild (20-49% NASCET) carotid artery stenosis // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2016. Vol. 52, N 3. P. 287-294.

    404. Noubiap J.J. et al. Meta-analysis comparing the frequency of carotid artery stenosis in patients with atrial fibrillation and vice versa // Am. J. Cardiol. 2021. Vol. 138. P. 72-79.

    405. Bartoli M.A. et al. Early carotid endarterectomy after intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. 2009. Vol. 37, N 5. P. 512-518.

    406. Barroso B. et al. Early carotid artery endarterectomy after intravenous thrombolysis therapy // Int. J. Stroke. 2013. Vol. 8, N 6.

    407. Naylor A. Thrombolysis and expedited carotid revascularization // J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino). 2015. Vol. 56, N 2. P. 159-164.

    408. Kakkos S.K., Vega de Ceniga M., Naylor R. A systematic review and meta-analysis of peri-procedural outcomes in patients undergoing carotid interventions following thrombolysis // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2021. Vol. 62, N 3. P. 340-349.

    409. Vellimana A.K. et al. Thrombolysis is an independent risk factor for poor outcome after carotid revascularization // Neurosurgery. 2018. Vol. 83, N 5. P. 922-930.

    410. Berge E. et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke // Eur. Stroke J. 2021. Vol. 6, N 1. P. I-LXII.

    411. Powers W.J. et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association // Stroke. 2019. Vol. 50, N 12. P. E344-E418.

    412. Bush C.K. et al. Endovascular treatment with stent-retriever devices for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials // PLoS One. 2016. Vol. 11, N 1. Article ID e0147287.

    413. Hellegering J. et al. Treatment of the extracranial carotid artery in tandem lesions during endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Ann. Transl. Med. 2020. Vol. 8, N 19. P. 1278-1278.

    414. Zhu F. et al. Impact of emergent cervical carotid stenting in tandem occlusion strokes treated by thrombectomy: a review of the TITAN collaboration // Front. Neurol. 2019. Vol. 10. P. 206.

    415. Zhu F. et al. Impact of antiplatelet therapy during endovascular therapy for tandem occlusions: a collaborative pooled analysis // Stroke. 2020. Vol. 51, N 5. P. 1522-1529.

    416. Papanagiotou P. et al. Carotid stenting with antithrombotic agents and intracranial thrombectomy leads to the highest recanalization rate in patients with acute stroke with tandem lesions // JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. Vol. 11, N 13. P. 1290-1299.

    417. Feil K. et al. Tandem lesions in anterior circulation stroke: analysis of the German stroke registry-endovascular treatment // Stroke. 2021. Vol. 52, N 4. P. 1265-1275.

    418. Park J.S. et al. Endovascular treatment of acute carotid atherosclerotic tandem occlusions: predictors of clinical outcomes as technical aspects and location of tandem occlusions // J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2020. Vol. 29, N 9. Article ID 105090.

    419. Wilson M.P. et al. Management of tandem occlusions in acute ischemic stroke - intracranial versus extracranial first and extracranial stenting versus angioplasty alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2018. Vol. 10, N 8. P. 721-728.

    420. Gemmete J.J. et al. Treatment strategies for tandem occlusions in acute ischemic stroke // Semin. Intervent. Radiol. 2020. Vol. 37, N 2. P. 207-213.

    421. Jonsson M. et al. Carotid endarterectomy after intracranial endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke in patients with carotid artery stenosis // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2022. Vol. 63, N 3. P. 371-378.

    422. Zhang L. et al. Increased internal carotid artery tortuosity is a risk factor for spontaneous cervicocerebral artery dissection // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2021. Vol. 61, N 4. P. 542-549.

    423. Goyal M. et al. Considerations for antiplatelet management of carotid stenting in the setting of mechanical thrombectomy: a Delphi consensus statement // AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2020. Vol. 41, N 12. P. 2274-2279.

    424. Da Ros V. et al. Carotid stenting and mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke and tandem occlusions: antithrombotic treatment and functional outcome // AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2020. Vol. 41, N 11. P. 288-293.

    425. Robertson V. et al. A Systematic review of procedural outcomes in patients with proximal common carotid or innominate artery disease with or without tandem ipsilateral internal carotid artery disease // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2020. Vol. 60, N 6. P. 817-827.

    426. Van De Weijer M.A.J. et al. Technical and clinical success and long-term durability of endovascular treatment for atherosclerotic aortic arch branch origin obstruction: evaluation of 144 procedures // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2015. Vol. 50, N 1. P. 13-20.

    427. Fox A.J. et al. Identification, prognosis, and management of patients with carotid artery near occlusion // AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2005. Vol. 26, N 8. P. 2086-2094.

    428. Bartlett E. et al. Diagnosing carotid stenosis near-occlusion by using CT angiography // AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2006. Vol. 27, N 3. P. 632-637.

    429. Naylor A.R. et al. Editor’s choice - management of atherosclerotic carotid and vertebral artery disease: 2017 clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2018. Vol. 55, N 1. P. 3-81.

    430. Meershoek A.J.A. et al. Meta-analysis of the outcomes of treatment of internal carotid artery near occlusion // Br. J. Surg. 2019. Vol. 106, N 6. P. 665-671.

    431. Xue S. et al. A systematic review and updated meta-analysis for carotid near-occlusion // Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2020. Vol. 66. P. 636-645.e3.

    432. García-Pastor A. et al. Early risk of recurrent stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid near-occlusion: results from CAOS, a multicenter registry study // Int. J. Stroke. 2017. Vol. 12, N 7. P. 713-719.

    433. Fridman S., Lownie S.P., Mandzia J. Diagnosis and management of carotid free-floating thrombus: a systematic literature review // Int. J. Stroke. 2019. Vol. 14, N 3. P. 247-256.

    434. Carr K. et al. Endovascular aspiration of a symptomatic free-floating common carotid artery thrombus // Neuroradiology. 2018. Vol. 60, N 10. P. 1103-1107.

    435. Oller M. et al. Rubeosis iridis as a sign of underlying carotid stenosis // J. Vasc. Surg. 2012. Vol. 56, N 6. P. 1724-1726.

    436. Kawaguchi S., Iida J.I., Uchiyama Y. Ocular circulation and chronic ocular ischemic syndrome before and after carotid artery revascularization surgery // J. Ophthalmol. 2012. Vol. 2012. Article ID 350475.

    437. Lewis S.C. et al. General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial // Lancet. 2008. Vol. 372, N 9656. P. 2132-2142.

    438. Knappich C. et al. Associations of perioperative variables with the 30-day risk of stroke or death in carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis // Stroke. 2019. Vol. 50, N 12. P. 3439-3448.

    439. Orlický M. et al. Anesthesia type determines risk of cerebral infarction after carotid endarterectomy // J. Vasc. Surg. 2019. Vol. 70, N 1. P. 138-147.

    440. Malik O.S., Brovman E.Y., Urman R.D. The use of regional or local anesthesia for carotid endarterectomies may reduce blood loss and pulmonary complications // J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2019. Vol. 33, N 4. P. 935-942.

    441. Grieff A.N. et al. Anesthesia type is associated with decreased cranial nerve injury in carotid endarterectomy // Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2021. Vol. 70. P. 318-325.

    442. Mracek J. et al. Patient satisfaction with general versus local anesthesia during carotid endarterectomy // J. Neurol. Surg. A Cent. Eur. Neurosurg. 2019. Vol. 80, N 5. P. 341-344.

    443. Harky A. et al. General anesthesia versus local anesthesia in carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2020. Vol. 34, N 1. P. 219-234.

    444. Hajibandeh S. et al. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of local vs. general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy // Anaesthesia. 2018. Vol. 73, N 10. P. 1280-1289.

    445. Harrop-Griffiths W. et al. Regional anaesthesia and patients with abnormalities of coagulation // Anaesthesia. 2013. Vol. 68, N 9. P. 966-972.

    446. Stoneham M.D., Thompson J.P. Arterial pressure management and carotid endarterectomy // Br. J. Anaesth. 2009. Vol. 102, N 4. P. 442-452.

    447. Bastounis E. et al. A short incision for carotid endarterectomy results in decreased morbidity // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2007. Vol. 33, N 6. P. 652-656.

    448. Marcucci G. et al. Short longitudinal versus transverse skin incision for carotid endarterectomy: impact on cranial and cervical nerve injuries and esthetic outcome // J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino). 2011. Vol. 52, N 2. P. 145-152.

    449. Ascher E. et al. Mini skin incision for carotid endarterectomy (CEA): a new and safe alternative to the standard approach // J. Vasc. Surg. 2005. Vol. 42, N 6. P. 1089-1093.

    450. Menon N.J. et al. The retrojugular approach to carotid endarterectomy - a safer technique? // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2005. Vol. 29, N 6. P. 608-610.

    451. Antoniou G.A. et al. Meta-analysis of retrojugular versus antejugular approach for carotid endarterectomy // Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2014. Vol. 96, N 3. P. 184-189.

    452. Tang T.Y. et al. Carotid sinus nerve blockade to reduce blood pressure instability following carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2007. Vol. 34, N 3. P. 304-311.

    453. Ajduk M. et al. Effect of carotid sinus nerve blockade on hemodynamic stability during carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia // J. Vasc. Surg. 2011. Vol. 54, N 2. P. 386-393.

    454. Zhou W. Commentary on "hemodynamic changes associated with carotid artery interventions" // Perspect. Vasc. Surg. Endovasc. Ther. 2008. Vol. 20, N 3. P. 297-298.

    455. Ben Ahmed S. et al. Does the technique of carotid endarterectomy determine postoperative hypertension? // Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2015. Vol. 29, N 6. P. 1272-1280.

    456. Demirel S. et al. Eversion carotid endarterectomy is associated with decreased baroreceptor sensitivity compared to the conventional technique // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2012. Vol. 44, N 1. P. 1-8.

    457. Demirel S. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of postcarotid endarterectomy hypertension after eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy // J. Vasc. Surg. 2017. Vol. 65, N 3. P. 868-882.

    458. Hosn M.A. et al. Long-term effect of the type of carotid endarterectomy on blood pressure // Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2017. Vol. 39. P. 204-208.

    459. Виноградов Р.А., Матусевич В.В. Антигипертензивные преимущества гломуссохраняющих каротидных эндартерэктомий в раннем послеоперационном периоде // Врач-аспирант. 2017. Т. 85, № 6. С. 4-9.

    460. Фокин А.А. и др. Оценка влияния синус-сберегающих модификаций каротидной эндартерэктомии на вегетативную регуляцию и центральную гемодинамику // Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2016. Т. 20, № 1. С. 19-24.

    461. Antsupov K.A. et al. Peculiarities of glomus-sparing eversion carotid endarterectomy // Angiol. Sosud. Khir. 2011. Vol. 17, N 2. P. 119-123.

    462. Гавриленко А.В., Аль-Юсеф Н.Н., Булатова Л.Р. Особенности течения послеоперационного периода после каротидной эндартерэктомии у пациентов с сохраненным или удаленным каротидным гломусом // Клиническая и экспериментальная хирургия. Журнал имени академика Б.В. Петровского. 2022. Т. 10, № 3. С. 23-27.

    463. Chuatrakoon B. et al. Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting) // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2022. Vol. 6, N 6. CD000190.

    464. Wiske C. et al. Comparing the efficacy of shunting approaches and cerebral monitoring during carotid endarterectomy using a national database // J. Vasc. Surg. 2018. Vol. 68, N 2. P. 416-425.

    465. Rerkasem A. et al. Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021. Vol. 10, N 10. CD000126.

    466. Jovanovic A. et al. Comparison of methods for monitoring intra-operative cerebral perfusion in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy with selective shunting: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2023. Vol. 65, N 2. P. 233-243.

    467. Levin S.R. et al. Shunt intention during carotid endarterectomy in the early symptomatic period and perioperative stroke risk // J. Vasc. Surg. 2020. Vol. 72, N 4. P. 1385-1394.e2.

    468. Lazarides M.K. et al. Editor’s choice - network meta-analysis of carotid endarterectomy closure techniques // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2021. Vol. 61, N 2. P. 181-190.

    469. Edenfield L. et al. Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy in the Vascular Quality Initiative based on patch type // J. Vasc. Surg. 2020. Vol. 71, N 4. P. 1260-1267.

    470. Ren S. et al. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of different types of patch materials during carotid endarterectomy // PLoS One. 2013. Vol. 8, N 1. Article ID e55050.

    471. Rerkasem K., Rothwell P.M. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of patch angioplasty versus primary closure and different types of patch materials during carotid endarterectomy // Asian J. Surg. 2011. Vol. 34, N 1. P. 32-40.

    472. Ignatenko P. et al. Carotid endarterectomy with autoarterial remodeling of bifurcation of the common carotid artery and carotid endarterectomy with patch closure: comparison of methods // J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2019. Vol. 28, N 3. P. 741-750.

    473. Stone D.H. et al. Editor’s choice - protamine reduces serious bleeding complications associated with carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients without increasing the risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death in a large national analysis // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2020. Vol. 60, N 6. P. 800-807.

    474. Paraskevas K.I. et al. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following eversion vs conventional carotid endarterectomy in randomised controlled trials and observational studies // J. Vasc. Surg. 2018. Vol. 67, N 5. P. 1632.

    475. Haddad F. et al. Bilateral carotid patch infection occurring 12 years following endarterectomy // Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2020. Vol. 65. P. 285.e11-285.e15.

    476. Youssef F. et al. The value of suction wound drain after carotid and femoral artery surgery: a randomised trial using duplex assessment of the volume of post-operative haematoma // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2005. Vol. 29, N 2. P. 162-166.

    477. Smolock C.J. et al. Drain placement confers no benefit after carotid endarterectomy in the Vascular Quality Initiative // J. Vasc. Surg. 2020. Vol. 72, N 1. P. 204-208.e1.

    478. Rivolta N. et al. To drain or not to drain following carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino). 2021. Vol. 62, N 4. P. 347-353.

    479. Kumar I.D. et al. Bilateral one-stage carotid endarterectomy--Is there an indication? // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2001. Vol. 21, N 6. P. 575-576.

    480. Xu R.W. et al. Feasibility and safety of simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting for bilateral carotid stenosis: a single-center experience using a hybrid procedure // Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2016. Vol. 33. P. 138-143.

    481. Knappich C. et al. Intraoperative completion studies in carotid endarterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of techniques and outcomes // Ann. Transl. Med. 2021. Vol. 9, N 14. P. 1201-1201.

    482. Gupta R., Horowitz M., Jovin T.G. Hemodynamic instability after carotid artery angioplasty and stent placement: a review of the literature // Neurosurg. Focus. 2005. Vol. 18, N 1. P. e6.

    483. Trocciola S.M. et al. Analysis of parameters associated with hypotension requiring vasopressor support after carotid angioplasty and stenting // J. Vasc. Surg. 2006. Vol. 43, N 4. P. 714-720.

    484. Клиническая апробация "Применение внутрисосудистого ультрозвукового исследования при стентировании внутренних сонных артерий для выявления протрузии атеросклеротической бляшки через стент". Идентификационный номер: 018-2-1. URL: https://static-0.minzdrav.gov.ru/system/

    485. Etxegoien N. et al. The transradial approach for carotid artery stenting // Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2012. Vol. 80, N 7. P. 1081-1087.

    486. Ruzsa Z. et al. A randomised comparison of transradial and transfemoral approach for carotid artery stenting: RADCAR (RADial access for CARotid artery stenting) study // EuroIntervention. 2014. Vol. 10, N 3. P. 381-391.

    487. Mendiz O.A. et al. Transradial versus transfemoral carotid artery stenting: a 16-year single-center experience // J. Interv. Cardiol. 2016. Vol. 29, N 6. P. 588-593.

    488. Montorsi P. et al. Carotid artery stenting with proximal embolic protection via a transradial or transbrachial approach: pushing the boundaries of the technique while maintaining safety and efficacy // J. Endovasc. Ther. 2016. Vol. 23, N 4. P. 549-560.

    489. Jaroenngarmsamer T. et al. Procedural success with radial access for carotid artery stenting: systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2020. Vol. 12, N 1. P. 87-93.

    490. Kashyap V.S. et al. Early outcomes in the ROADSTER 2 study of transcarotid artery revascularization in patients with significant carotid artery disease // Stroke. 2020. Vol. 51, N 9. P. 2620-2629.

    491. Kwolek C.J. et al. Results of the ROADSTER multicenter trial of transcarotid stenting with dynamic flow reversal // J. Vasc. Surg. 2015. Vol. 62, N 5. P. 1227-1234.e1.

    492. Leal I. et al. A diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-based study of transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal versus transfemoral filter protection // J. Vasc. Surg. 2012. Vol. 56, N 6. P. 1585-1590.

    493. Dakour-Aridi H. et al. The impact of age on in-hospital outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization, transfemoral carotid artery stenting, and carotid endarterectomy // J. Vasc. Surg. 2020. Vol. 72, N 3. P. 931-942.e2.

    494. Schermerhorn M.L. et al. In-hospital outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization and carotid endarterectomy in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative // J. Vasc. Surg. 2020. Vol. 71, N 1. P. 87-95.

    495. Ghannam M. et al. Transcarotid arterial revascularization of symptomatic internal carotid artery disease: a systematic review and study-level meta-analysis // Stroke. 2024. Vol. 55, N 4. P. 921-930.

    496. Loufopoulos G. et al. Trans-carotid artery revascularization versus carotid endarterectomy in patients with carotid artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of 30-day outcomes // Angiology. 2024. Mar 27. Article ID 33197241241788.

    497. Bai X. et al. Protocol: Safety and efficacy of transcarotid artery revascularisation versus carotid endarterectomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis study // BMJ Open. 2021. Vol. 11, N 5. Article ID 43039.

    498. Nana P.N. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of carotid artery stenting using the transcervical approach // Int. Angiol. 2020. Vol. 39, N 5. P. 372-380.

    499. Mazurek A. et al. Carotid artery revascularization using second generation stents versus surgery: a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes // J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino). 2023. Vol. 64, N 6. P. 570-582.

    500. Mazurek A. et al. Clinical outcomes of second- versus first-generation carotid stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Clin. Med. 2022. Vol. 11, N 16. Article ID 4819.

    501. Karpenko A. et al. Randomized controlled trial of conventional versus MicroNet-covered stent in carotid artery revascularization: 12-month outcomes // JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2023. Vol. 16, N 7. P. 878-880.

    502. Osipova O. et al. Is it possible to prevent cerebral embolization by improving the design and technology of carotid stent implantation? // Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2020. Vol. 18, N 12. P. 891-904.

    503. Timaran C.H. et al. Randomized clinical trial of open-cell vs closed-cell stents for carotid stenting and effects of stent design on cerebral embolization // J. Vasc. Surg. 2011. Vol. 54, N 5. P. 1310-1316.e1.

    504. Park K.Y. et al. Incidence of embolism associated with carotid artery stenting: open-cell versus closed-cell stents // J. Neurosurg. 2013. Vol. 119, N 3. P. 642-647.

    505. Wodarg F. et al. Influence of stent design and use of protection devices on outcome of carotid artery stenting: a pooled analysis of individual patient data // J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2018. Vol. 10, N 12. P. 1149-1154.

    506. Müller M.D. et al. Stent design, restenosis and recurrent stroke after carotid artery stenting in the International Carotid Stenting Study // Stroke. 2019. Vol. 50, N 11. P. 3013-3020.

    507. Knappich C. et al. The use of embolic protection devices is associated with a lower stroke and death rate after carotid stenting // JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2017. Vol. 10, N 12. P. 1257-1265.

    508. Faateh M. et al. Risk of emergent carotid endarterectomy varies by type of presenting symptoms // J. Vasc. Surg. 2019. Vol. 70, N 1. P. 130-137.e1.

    509. de Vries E.E. et al. A meta-analysis of the effect of stent design on clinical and radiologic outcomes of carotid artery stenting // J. Vasc. Surg. 2019. Vol. 69, N 6. P. 1952-1961.e1.

    510. Stabile E. et al. Use of dual-layered stents for carotid artery angioplasty: 1-year results of a patient-based meta-analysis // JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2020. Vol. 13, N 14. P. 1709-1715.

    511. Yilmaz U. et al. Acute occlusions of dual-layer carotid stents after endovascular emergency treatment of tandem lesions // Stroke. 2017. Vol. 48, N 8. P. 2171-2175.

    512. Imamura H. et al. Clinical trial of carotid artery stenting using dual-layer CASPER stent for carotid endarterectomy in patients at high and normal risk in the Japanese population // J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2021. Vol. 13, N 6. P. 524-529.

    513. Kokkosis A.A. et al. Assessing the suitability of the carotid bifurcation for stenting: anatomic and morphologic considerations // J. Vasc. Surg. 2021. Vol. 74, N 6. P. 2087-2095.

    514. Ziapour B. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of predilation and postdilation in transfemoral carotid artery stenting // J. Vasc. Surg. 2020. Vol. 72, N 1. P. 346-355.e1.

    515. Hicks C.W. et al. Use of a primary carotid stenting technique does not affect perioperative outcomes // J. Vasc. Surg. 2018. Vol. 67, N 6. P. 1736-1743.e1.

    516. Giannakopoulos T.G. et al. Association between plaque echogenicity and embolic material captured in filter during protected carotid angioplasty and stenting // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2012. Vol. 43, N 6. P. 627-631.

    517. Touzé E. et al. Systematic review of the perioperative risks of stroke or death after carotid angioplasty and stenting // Stroke. 2009. Vol. 40, N 12. P. e683-e693.

    518. Cremonesi A. et al. Carotid artery stenting: an update // Eur. Heart J. 2015. Vol. 36, N 1. P. 13-21.

    519. Клиническая апробация "Метод чрескожного эндоваскулярного лечения субтотальных атеросклеротических поражений каротидных артерий с применением проивоэмболического стента и проксимальной системы церебральной защиты". 2019. Идентификационный номер: 2019-14-14. URL: https://static-0.minzdrav.gov.ru/system/attachments/attaches/000/046/917/original/2019-14-14.pdf?1566830425

    520. Krul J.M.J. et al. Site and pathogenesis of infarcts associated with carotid endarterectomy // Stroke. 1989. Vol. 20, N 3. P. 324-328.

    521. Шмигельский A.B., Усачев Д.Ю., Лукшин В.А. Мультимодальный нейромониторинг в ранней диагностике ишемии головного мозга при реконструкции сонных артерий // Анестезиология и реаниматология. 2008. № 2. С. 16-22.

    522. Leopardi M. et al. Multimodal neurophysiological monitoring reduces shunt incidence during carotid endarterectomy // Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2019. Vol. 61. P. 178-184.

    523. Domenick Sridharan N. et al. Predictors of cross-clamp-induced intraoperative monitoring changes during carotid endarterectomy using both electroencephalography and somatosensory evoked potentials // J. Vasc. Surg. 2018. Vol. 67, N 1. P. 191-198.

    524. Naylor A.R. et al. Patterns of vascular pathology in acute, first-ever cerebral infarction // Scott. Med. J. 1993. Vol. 38, N 2. P. 41-44.

    525. Meershoek A.J.A. et al. Clinical response to procedural stroke following carotid endarterectomy: a Delphi consensus study // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2021. Vol. 62, N 3. P. 350-357.

    526. Huibers A. et al. Plaque echolucency and the risk of ischaemic stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis within the first asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST-1) // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2016. Vol. 51, N 5. P. 616-621.

    527. Perler B.A. et al. Immediate postoperative thrombolytic therapy: an aggressive strategy for neurologic salvage when cerebral thromboembolism complicates carotid endarterectomy // J. Vasc. Surg. 2000. Vol. 31, N 5. P. 1033-1037.

    528. Ferguson G.G. et al. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: surgical results in 1415 patients // Stroke. 1999. Vol. 30, N 9. P. 1751-1758.

    529. Doig D. et al. Risk factors for stroke, myocardial infarction, or death following carotid endarterectomy: results from the International Carotid Stenting Study // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2015. Vol. 50, N 6. P. 688.

    530. van den Berg J.C. Neuro-rescue during carotid stenting // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2008. Vol. 36, N 6. P. 627-636.

    531. de Geus S.W.L. et al. Perioperative outcomes of carotid interventions in octogenarians // Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2020. Vol. 68. P. 15-21.

    532. Ederle J. et al. Effect of white-matter lesions on the risk of periprocedural stroke after carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy in the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS): a prespecified analysis of data from a randomised trial // Lancet Neurol. 2013. Vol. 12, N 9. P. 866-872.

    533. Wong J.H., Findlay J.M., Suarez-Almazor M.E. Hemodynamic instability after carotid endarterectomy: risk factors and associations with operative complications // Neurosurgery. 1997. Vol. 41, N 1. P. 35-43.

    534. Tan T.W. et al. The need for treatment of hemodynamic instability following carotid endarterectomy is associated with increased perioperative and 1-year morbidity and mortality // J. Vasc. Surg. 2014. Vol. 59, N 1. P. 16-24.e1-e2.

    535. Mylonas S.N. et al. Carotid artery stenting-induced hemodynamic instability // J. Endovasc. Ther. 2013. Vol. 20, N 1. P. 48-60.

    536. Csobay-Novák C. et al. Role of stent selection in the incidence of persisting hemodynamic depression after carotid artery stenting // J. Endovasc. Ther. 2015. Vol. 22, N 1. P. 122-129.

    537. Liu J. et al. A study on related factors of hemodynamic depression in carotid artery stenting // Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018. Vol. 22, N 16. P. 5255-5263.

    538. Chung C. et al. Improved hemodynamic outcomes with glycopyrrolate over atropine in carotid angioplasty and stenting // Perspect. Vasc. Surg. Endovasc. Ther. 2010. Vol. 22, N 3. P. 164-170.

    539. Sharma S., Lardizabal J.A., Bhambi B. Oral midodrine is effective for the treatment of hypotension associated with carotid artery stenting // J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008. Vol. 13, N 2. P. 94-97.

    540. Newman J.E. et al. Post-carotid endarterectomy hypertension. Part 2: association with peri-operative clinical, anaesthetic, and transcranial doppler derived parameters // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2017. Vol. 54, N 5. P. 564-572.

    541. Sigaudo-Roussel D. et al. Deterioration in carotid baroreflex during carotid endarterectomy // J. Vasc. Surg. 2002. Vol. 36, N 4. P. 793-798.

    542. Smith B.L., Dallas T. Hypertension following carotid endarterectomy: the role of cerebral renin production // J. Vasc. Surg. 1984. Vol. 1, N 5. P. 623-627.

    543. Ahn S.S., Marcus D.R., Moore W.S. Post-carotid endarterectomy hypertension: association with elevated cranial norepinephrine // J. Vasc. Surg. 1989. Vol. 9, N 2. P. 0351-0360.

    544. Asiddao C.B. et al. Factors associated with perioperative complications during carotid endarterectomy // Anesth. Analg. 1982. Vol. 27, N 2. P. 631-637.

    545. Mehta M. et al. Eversion technique increases the risk for post-carotid endarterectomy hypertension // J. Vasc. Surg. 2001. Vol. 34, N 5. P. 839-845.

    546. Nolde J.M. et al. No evidence for long term blood pressure differences between eversion and conventional carotid endarterectomy in two independent study cohorts // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2022. Vol. 63, N 1. P. 33-42.

    547. Towne J., Bernhard V.M. The relationship of postoperative hypertension to complications following carotid endarterectomy // Surgery. 1980. Vol. 88. P. 575-580.

    548. Payne D.A. et al. Antiplatelet agents and risk factors for bleeding postcarotid endarterectomy // Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2010. Vol. 24, N 7. P. 900-907.

    549. Naylor A.R. et al. Seizures after carotid endarterectomy: hyperperfusion, dysautoregulation or hypertensive encephalopathy? // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2003. Vol. 26, N 1. P. 39-44.

    550. Abou-Chebl A. et al. Intensive treatment of hypertension decreases the risk of hyperperfusion and intracerebral hemorrhage following carotid artery stenting // Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2007. Vol. 69, N 5. P. 690-696.

    551. Hsu A.C. et al. Risk factors for cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome following carotid revascularization // Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2023. Vol. 97. P. 89-96.

    552. Huibers A.E. et al. Editor’s choice - cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid artery stenting: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2018. Vol. 56, N 3. P. 322-333.

    553. Kirchoff-Torres K.F., Bakradze E. Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid revascularization and acute ischemic stroke // Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2018. Vol. 22, N 4. P. 24.

    554. Baptista M.V. et al. Conflicting images // Lancet. 1998. Vol. 351, N 9100. P. 414.

    555. Pennekamp C.W.A. et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy can predict the onset of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid endarterectomy // Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2012. Vol. 34, N 4. P. 314-321.

    556. Niimi J. et al. [Usefulness of bilateral rSO2 monitoring for predicting cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid artery stenting] // No Shinkei Geka. No Shinkei Geka, 2017. Vol. 45, N 10. P. 859-867.

    557. Matsumoto S. et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy in carotid artery stenting predicts cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome // Neurology. 2009. Vol. 72, N 17. P. 1512-1518.

    558. Щаницын И.Н. и др. Роль церебральной оксиметрии в прогнозировании синдрома гиперперфузии после каротидной эндартерэктомии // Ангиология и сосудистая хирургия. 2018. Т. 24, № 4. С. 19-25.

    559. Wada H., Saito M., Kamada K. Evaluation of changes of intracranial blood flow after carotid artery stenting using digital subtraction angiography flow assessment // World J. Radiol. 2015. Vol. 7, N 2. P. 45-51.

    560. Fassaert L.M.M. et al. Transcranial Doppler 24 hours after carotid endarterectomy accurately identifies patients not at risk of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2019. Vol. 58, N 3. P. 320-327.

    561. Li Q. et al. Intraoperative transcranial Doppler monitoring predicts the risk of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid endarterectomy // World Neurosurg. 2022. Vol. 165. P. e571-e580.

    562. Nishimoto T. et al. Relationship between cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome and the immediate change of cerebral blood flow after carotid artery stenting evaluated by single-photon emission computed tomography // Neuroradiology. 2022. Vol. 64, N 6. P. 1157-1164.

    563. Abreu P. et al. Intracerebral hemorrhage as a manifestation of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid revascularization: systematic review and meta-analysis // Acta Neurochir. (Wien). 2017. Vol. 159, N 11. P. 2089-2097.

    564. Hussain M.A. et al. Risk of intracranial hemorrhage after carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy: a population-based study // J. Neurosurg. 2018. Vol. 129, N 6. P. 1522-1529.

    565. Galyfos G., Sianou A., Filis K. Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome and intracranial hemorrhage after carotid endarterectomy or carotid stenting: a meta-analysis // J. Neurol. Sci. 2017. Vol. 381. P. 74-82.

    566. Doig D. et al. Incidence, impact, and predictors of cranial nerve palsy and haematoma following carotid endarterectomy in the international carotid stenting study // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2014. Vol. 48, N 5. P. 498-504.

    567. Hye R.J. et al. Incidence, outcomes, and effect on quality of life of cranial nerve injury in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial // J. Vasc. Surg. 2015. Vol. 61, N 5. P. 1208-1215.

    568. Kakisis J.D. et al. Cranial nerve injury after carotid endarterectomy: incidence, risk factors, and time trends // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2017. Vol. 53, N 3. P. 320-335.

    569. Giannopoulos S. et al. Revascularization of radiation-induced carotid artery stenosis with carotid endarterectomy vs carotid artery stenting: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Cardiovasc. Revasc. Med. 2018. Vol. 19, N 5. Pt B. P. 638-644.

    570. Texakalidis P. et al. Risk factors for restenosis after carotid revascularization: a meta-analysis of hazard ratios // World Neurosurg. 2019. Vol. 125. P. 414-424.

    571. Lejay A. et al. Post-operative infection of prosthetic materials or stents involving the supra-aortic trunks: a comprehensive review // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2018. Vol. 56, N 6. P. 885-900.

    572. Varetto G. et al. Carotid pseudoaneurysm after eversion endarterectomy: a case report and review of the literature // Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2018. Vol. 52, N 4. P. 309-312.

    573. Terzian W.T.H., Schadt S., Sheth S.U. Right carotid-cutaneous fistula and right carotid pseudoaneurysm formation secondary to a chronically infected polyethylene terephthalate patch // Int. J. Crit. Illn. Inj. Sci. 2018. Vol. 8, N 1. P. 48-51.

    574. Bannazadeh M. et al. Endovascular repair of infected carotid pseudoaneurysm: a case report // Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2020. Vol. 72. P. 163-165.

    575. Naylor R. Management of prosthetic patch infection after CEA // J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino). 2016. Vol. 57, N 2. P. 137-144.

    576. Lazaris A. et al. Patch corrugation on Duplex ultrasonography may be an early warning of prosthetic patch infection // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2005. Vol. 29, N 1. P. 91-92.

    577. Chakfé N. et al. Editor’s choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2020 clinical practice guidelines on the management of vascular graft and endograft infections // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2020. Vol. 59, N 3. P. 339-384.

    578. Matano F. et al. Radial artery graft for giant common carotid artery pseudoaneurysm after carotid artery stenting // World Neurosurg. 2020. Vol. 139. P. 401-404.

    579. Thorbjornsen K. et al. Editor’s choice - long-term outcome after EndoVAC hybrid repair of infected vascular reconstructions // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2016. Vol. 51, №N 5. P. 724-732.

    580. Bonati L.H. et al. Restenosis and risk of stroke after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS): secondary analysis of a randomised trial // Lancet Neurol. 2018. Vol. 17, N 7. P. 587-596.

    581. Cheng S.F. et al. Long-term restenosis rate after carotid endarterectomy: comparison of three surgical techniques and intra-operative shunt use // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2021. Vol. 62, N 4. P. 513-521.

    582. Kumar R. et al. Restenosis after carotid interventions and its relationship with recurrent ipsilateral stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2017. Vol. 53, N 6. P. 766-775.

    583. AbuRahma A.F. et al. Proposed duplex velocity criteria for carotid restenosis following carotid endarterectomy with patch closure // J. Vasc. Surg. 2009. Vol. 50, N 2. P. 286-291.

    584. de Borst G.J. et al. Effect of carotid angioplasty and stenting on duplex velocity measurements in a porcine model // J. Endovasc. Ther. 2008. Vol. 15, N 6. P. 672-679.

    585. Lal B.K. et al. Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery // J. Vasc. Surg. 2008. Vol. 47, N 1. P. 63-73.

    586. Stanziale S.F. et al. Determining in-stent stenosis of carotid arteries by duplex ultrasound criteria // J. Endovasc. Ther. 2005. Vol. 12, N 3. P. 346-353.

    587. Bosch F.T.M. et al. Optimal cut-off criteria for duplex ultrasound compared with computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of restenosis in stented carotid arteries in the international carotid stenting study // Eur. Stroke J. 2017. Vol. 2, N 1. P. 37-45.

    588. Fokkema M. et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy for restenosis following prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy: an individual patient data meta-analysis // Ann. Surg. 2015. Vol. 261, N 3. P. 598-604.

    589. Arhuidese I.J. et al. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with prior ipsilateral carotid artery stenting // J. Vasc. Surg. 2017. Vol. 65, N 5. P. 1418-1428.

    590. Xu D.S. et al. External carotid artery stenting to treat patients with symptomatic ipsilateral internal carotid artery occlusion: a multicenter case series // Neurosurgery. 2010. Vol. 67, N 2. P. 314-321.

    591. Куперберг Е.Б. и др. Динамическая рентгеновская компьютерная томография в оценке эффективного создания экстра-интракраниального микроанастомоза при окклюзии внутренней сонной артерии // Ангиология и сосудистая хирургия 1997. Т. 3, № 2 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.angiolsurgery.org/magazine/1997/2/2.htm (дата обращения: 09.05.2024).

    592. Вачев А.Н. и др. Хирургическое лечение пациентов с окклюзией внутренней сонной артерии // Ангиология и сосудистая хирургия. 2006. Т. 12, № 3 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://angiolsurgery.org/magazine/2006/3/15.htm (дата обращения: 09.05.2024).

    593. Fields W.S., Bruetman M., Weibel J. Collateral circulation of the brain. // Monogr. Surg. Sci. 1965. Vol. 2, N 3. P. 183-259.

    594. Wang J. et al. Four collateral circulation pathways were observed after common carotid artery occlusion // BMC Neurol. 2019. Vol. 19, N 1. P. 201.

    595. Акифьева О.Д. и др. Однофотонная эмиссионная компьютерная томография в оценке эффективности хирургического лечения у больных с окклюзией внутренней сонной артерии // Новости хирургии. 2010. Т. 18, № 1. С. 37-40.

    596. Акифьева О.Д. и др. Современные методы диагностики мозговой перфузии у больных с окклюзией внутренней сонной артерии // Регионарное кровообращение и микроциркуляция. 2010. Т. 9, № 2. С. 24-27.

    597. Shimonaga K. et al. Increased cerebrovascular reactivity in selected brain regions after extracranial-intracranial bypass improves the speed and accuracy of visual cancellation in patients with severe steno-occlusive disease: a preliminary study // Neurosurg. Rev. 2022. Vol. 45, N 3. P. 2257-2268.

    598. Xu B. et al. Current understanding of chronic total occlusion of the internal carotid artery // Biomed. Rep. 2018. Vol. 8, N 2. P. 117.

    599. Лукшин В.А. и др. Критерии эффективности хирургической реваскуляризации головного мозга у больных с хронической церебральной ишемией // Вопросы нейрохирургии имени Н.Н. Бурденко. 2016. Т. 80, № 2. С. 53-63.

    600. Kuroda S. et al. Clinical significance of STA-MCA double anastomosis for hemodynamic compromise in post-JET/COSS era // Acta Neurochir. (Wien). 2014. Vol. 156, N 1. P. 77-83.

    601. Shimonaga K. et al. Increased cerebrovascular reactivity in selected brain regions after extracranial-intracranial bypass improves the speed and accuracy of visual cancellation in patients with severe steno-occlusive disease: a preliminary study // Neurosurg. Rev. 2022. Vol. 45, N 3. P. 2257-2268.

    602. Usachev D.Y. et al. A 20-year experience in surgical treatment of steno-occlusive lesion of craniocervical arteries at the Burdenko Neurosurgical Center // Zh. Vopr. Neirokhir. Im. N. N. Burdenko. 2020. Vol. 84, N 3. P. 6-20.

    603. Можаровский К.В. и др. Оценка эффективности эндартерэктомии наружной сонной артерии у больных с окклюзией внутренней сонной артерии // Регионарное кровообращение и микроциркуляция. 2023. Т. 22, № 2. С. 28-33.

    604. Коновалов А.Н. и др. Хирургическое лечение сосудистых заболеваний головного мозга // Журнал неврологии и психиатрии им. С.С. Корсакова. 2015. Т. 115, № 7. С. 4-21.

    605. Zhang H. et al. Endovascular recanalization and standard medical management for symptomatic non-acute intracranial artery occlusion: study protocol for a non-randomized, 24-month, multicenter study // Front Neurol. 2021. Vol. 12. Article ID 729534.

    606. Hasan D. et al. Feasibility, safety, and changes in systolic blood pressure associated with endovascular revascularization of symptomatic and chronically occluded cervical internal carotid artery using a newly suggested radiographic classification of chronically occluded cervical internal carotid artery: pilot study // J. Neurosurg. 2018. Vol. 130, N 5. P. 1468-1477.

    607. Yaşargil M.G., Krayenbühl H.A., Donaghy R.M.P. Microsurgery: Applied to Neurosurgery. New York; London: Academic Press, 2014. 247 p.

    608. The International Cooperative Study of Extracranial/Intracranial Arterial Anastomosis (EC/IC Bypass Study): methodology and entry characteristics. The EC/IC Bypass Study Group // Stroke. 1985. Vol. 16, N 3. P. 397-406.

    609. Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. Results of an international randomized trial // N. Engl. J. Med. 1985. Vol. 313, N 19. P. 1191-1200.

    610. Powers W.J. et al. Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for stroke prevention in hemodynamic cerebral ischemia: the Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study: a randomized trial // JAMA. 2011. Vol. 306, N 18. P. 1983.

    611. Schaller B. Extracranial-intracranial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in intracranial aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation: a systematic review // J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2008. Vol. 17, N 5. P. 287-298.

    612. Garrett M.C. et al. The extracranial-intracranial bypass trial: implications for future investigations // Neurosurg. Focus. 2008. Vol. 24, N 2. P. E4.

    613. Fluri F. et al. Extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass surgery for occlusive carotid artery disease // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2010. Vol. 2. CD005953.

    614. Bai X. et al. Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for occlusive atherosclerotic disease of the anterior cerebral circulation: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis // Syst. Rev. 2020. Vol. 9, N 1. P. 70.

    615. Abdelgadir J. et al. Revisiting flow augmentation bypass for cerebrovascular atherosclerotic vaso-occlusive disease: single-surgeon series and review of the literature // PLoS One. 2023. Vol. 18, N 5. Article ID e0285982.

    616. Nguyen V.N. et al. Extracranial-intracranial cerebral revascularization for atherosclerotic vessel occlusion: an updated systematic review of the literature // World Neurosurg. 2023. Vol. 173. P. 199-207.e8.

    617. Shatravka A. et al. Analysis of the efficiency of external carotid surgery // Angiol. Sosud. Khir. 2015. Vol. 21, N 2. P. 115-123.

    618. Zanaty M. et al. Recanalization of the chronically occluded internal carotid artery: review of the literature // World Neurosurg X. 2019. Vol. 5. Article ID 100067.

    619. Li J. et al. Hybrid surgery for nontaper or nonstump lesions in symptomatic subacute or chronic internal carotid occlusion: a better solution // World Neurosurg. 2019. Vol. 122. P. e1416-e1425.

    620. Fan W. et al. Recanalization of symptomatic chronic internal carotid artery occlusions by hybrid treatment // Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2021. Vol. 207. Article ID 106752.

    621. Martins H.F.G. et al. Morphological changes of the internal carotid artery: prevalence and characteristics. A clinical and ultrasonographic study in a series of 19 804 patients over 25 years old // Eur. J. Neurol. 2018. Vol. 25, N 1. P. 171-177.

    622. Ballotta E. et al. Surgical vs medical treatment for isolated internal carotid artery elongation with coiling or kinking in symptomatic patients: a prospective randomized clinical study // J. Vasc. Surg. 2005. Vol. 42, N 5. P. 838-846.

    623. Боголюбов В.М. Медицинская реабилитация: руководство: в 3 т. / под ред. В.М. Бололюбова. Москва, 2007. ISBN: 978-5-88187-025-5; ISBN: 5-88187-026-3; ISBN; 5-88187-029-8.

    624. Родионов С.В. и др. Методические разработки к занятиям по реабилитации хирургических пациентов. Москва : ГБОУ ВПО Российский национальный исследовательский медицинский университет им. Н.И. Пирогова Минздрава России, 2020. 49 с.

    625. Волянская А.П. Реабилитация пациентов после ОНМК в составе мультидисциплинарной бригады! Статья на сайте Волынской больницы от 5 декабря 2023 г. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://volynka.ru/Articles/Text/2929 (дата обращения: 13.05.2024).

    626. Коломойцев С.Н. Профилактика и лечение повреждений черепно-мозговых нервов в реконструктивной хирургии сонных артерий : дис. - канд. мед. наук. Ставрополь, 2004. 126 с.

    627. Матюшкин А.В., Мустафин А.Х. Анализ и методы профилактики повреждений черепных нервов при каротидной эндартерэктомии // Инновационная медицина Кубани. 2019. № 4. С. 18-23.

    628. Восканян Ю.Э., Коломейцев С.Н., Шнютов Р.В. Факторы риска и профилактика повреждений черепно-мозговых нервов в реконструктивной хирургии сонных артерий // Ангиология и сосудистая хирургия. 2005. Т. 11, № 2. С. 96.

    629. AbuRahma A.F., Choueiri M.A. Cranial and cervical nerve injuries after repeat carotid endarterectomy // J. Vasc. Surg. 2000. Vol. 32, N 4. P. 649-654.

    630. Cevik O.M. et al. The carotid endarterectomy cadaveric investigation for cranial nerve injuries: anatomical study // Brain Sci. 2021. Vol. 11, N 2. P. 1-9.

    631. Zannetti S., Cao P. Cranial nerve injury after carotid surgery // Acta Chir. Belg. 1999. Vol. 99, N 5. P. 221-225.

    632. Downs A.R., Jessen M., Lye C.R. Peripheral nerve injuries during carotid endarterectomy // Can. J. Surg. 1987. Vol. 30, N 1. P. 22-24.

    633. Bartolucci R. et al. Cranial and neck nerve injuries following carotid endarterectomy intervention. Review of the literature // Chir. Ital. 2001. Vol. 53, N 1. P. 73-80.

    634. Национальные рекомендации по ведению пациентов с сосудистой артериальной патологией (Российский согласительный документ). Часть. 3. Экстракраниальные (брахиоцефальные) артерии [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://bakulev.ru/___science/publish/book/detail.php?ID=8893 (дата обращения: 15.05.2024).

    635. Biedler A. et al. [Postoperative cognition disorders in elderly patients. The results of the "International Study of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction"] // Anaesthesist. 1999. Vol. 48, N 12. P. 884-895.

    636. Zhou W. et al. Prospective neurocognitive evaluation of patients undergoing carotid interventions // J. Vasc. Surg. 2012. Vol. 56, N 6. P. 1571-1578.

    637. Mracek J. et al. Indications for general versus local anesthesia during carotid endarterectomy // J. Neurol. Surg. A Cent. Eur. Neurosurg. 2019. Vol. 80, N 4. P. 250-254.

    638. Белов Ю.В. и др. Нейрокогнитивные и психоэмоциональные расстройства у пациентов с атеросклерозом внутренних сонных артерий в послеоперационном периоде после каротидной эндартерэктомии // Кардиология и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. 2015. № 4. С. 37-42.

    639. Zierler R.E. et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on follow-up after vascular surgery arterial procedures // J. Vasc. Surg. 2018. Vol. 68, N 1. P. 256-284.

    640. Moore W.S. et al. Recurrent carotid stenosis: results of the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study // Stroke. 1998. Vol. 29, N 10. P. 2018-2025.

    641. Lal B.K. et al. In-stent recurrent stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Life table analysis and clinical relevance // J. Vasc. Surg. 2003. Vol. 38, N 6. P. 1162-1168.

    642. Lal B.K. et al. Restenosis after carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy: a secondary analysis of CREST, a randomised controlled trial // Lancet Neurol. 2012. Vol. 11, N 9. P. 755-763.

    643. Lattimer C.R., Burnand K.G. Recurrent carotid stenosis after carotid endarterectomy // Br. J. Surg. 1997. Vol. 84, N 9. P. 1206-1219.

    644. Кобалава Ж.Д. и др. Артериальная гипертензия у взрослых. Клинические рекомендации 2020 // Российский кардиологический журнал. 2020. Т. 25, № 3. С. 149-218.

    645. Halsey J.H. et al. Blood velocity in the middle cerebral artery and regional cerebral blood flow during carotid endarterectomy // Stroke. 1989. Vol. 20, N 1. P. 53-58.

    646. Драпкина О.М. и др. Российское общество профилактики неинфекционных заболеваний (РОПНИЗ). Алиментарно-зависимые факторы риска хронических неинфекционных заболеваний и привычки питания: диетологическая коррекция в рамках профилактического консультирования. Методические рекомендации // Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика. 2021. Т. 20, № 5. С. 273- 334.

    647. Pelliccia A. et al. 2020 ESC guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease // Eur. Heart J. 2021. Vol. 42, N 1. P. 17-96.

    648. Агеев Ф.Т. и др. Рекомендации по диспансерному наблюдению больных с сердечно-сосудистыми заболеваниями / под общ. ред. Е.И. Чазова. Москва, 2014. 16 с.

    649. Cohen D.J. et al. Health-related quality of life after carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: results from CREST (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial) // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011. Vol. 58, N 15. P. 1557-1565.

    650. Naylor A.R. et al. Carotid artery disease and stroke during coronary artery bypass: a critical review of the literature // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2002. Vol. 23, N 4. P. 283-294.

    651. Gaudino M. et al. Early versus delayed stroke after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2019. Vol. 8, N 13. Article ID e012447.

    652. Klarin D. et al. Concomitant carotid endarterectomy and cardiac surgery does not decrease postoperative stroke rates // J. Vasc. Surg. 2020. Vol. 72, N 2. P. 589-596. e3.

    653. Naylor A.R., Bown M.J. Stroke after cardiac surgery and its association with asymptomatic carotid disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2011. Vol. 41, N 5. P. 607-624.

    654. D’Agostino R.S. et al. Screening carotid ultrasonography and risk factors for stroke in coronary artery surgery patients // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996. Vol. 62, N 6. P. 1714-1723.

    655. Stamou S.C. et al. Stroke after coronary artery bypass: incidence, predictors, and clinical outcome // Stroke. 2001. Vol. 32, N 7. P. 1508-1512.

    656. Schoof J. et al. Impaired cerebral autoregulation distal to carotid stenosis/occlusion is associated with increased risk of stroke at cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2007. Vol. 134, N 3. P. 690-696.

    657. Katz E.S. et al. Protruding aortic atheromas predict stroke in elderly patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: experience with intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1992. Vol. 20, N 1. P. 70-77.

    658. Sen S. et al. Distribution, severity and risk factors for aortic atherosclerosis in cerebral ischemia // Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2000. Vol. 10, N 2. P. 102-109.

    659. Aboyans V., Lacroix P. Indications for carotid screening in patients with coronary artery disease // Presse Med. 2009. Vol. 38, N 6. P. 977-986.

    660. Ashrafi M. et al. Carotid endarterectomy for critical stenosis prior to cardiac surgery: should it be done? A retrospective cohort study // Int. J. Surg. 2016. Vol. 26. P. 53-57.

    661. Illuminati G. et al. Short-term results of a randomized trial examining timing of carotid endarterectomy in patients with severe asymptomatic unilateral carotid stenosis undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting // J. Vasc. Surg. 2011. Vol. 54, N 4. P. 993-999.

    662. Weimar C. et al. Safety of simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting and carotid endarterectomy versus isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized clinical trial // Stroke. 2017. Vol. 48, N 10. P. 2769-2775.

    663. Lin J.C. et al. Clinical utility of carotid duplex ultrasound prior to cardiac surgery // J. Vasc. Surg. 2016. Vol. 63, N 3. P. 710-714.

    664. Timaran C.H. et al. Trends and outcomes of concurrent carotid revascularization and coronary bypass // J. Vasc. Surg. 2008. Vol. 48, N 2. P. 355-360.

    665. Paraskevas K.I. et al. Carotid stenting prior to coronary bypass surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2017. Vol. 53, N 3. P. 309-319.

    666. Feldman D.N. et al. Comparison of trends and in-hospital outcomes of concurrent carotid artery revascularization and coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the United States experience 2004 to 2012. // JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2017. Vol. 10, N 3. P. 286-298.

    667. Naylor A.R., Mehta Z., Rothwell P.M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 30-day outcomes following staged carotid artery stenting and coronary bypass // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2009. Vol. 37, N 4. P. 379-387.

    668. Naylor A.R. et al. A systematic review of outcomes following staged and synchronous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2003. Vol. 25, N 5. P. 380-389.

    669. Sirimarco G. et al. Carotid atherosclerosis and risk of subsequent coronary event in outpatients with atherothrombosis // Stroke. 2013. Vol. 44, N 2. P. 373-379.

    670. Razzouk L. et al. Co-existence of vascular disease in different arterial beds: peripheral artery disease and carotid artery stenosis - data from Life Line Screening(®) // Atherosclerosis. 2015. Vol. 241, N 2. P. 687-691.

    671. Ahmed B., Al-Khaffaf H. Prevalence of significant asymptomatic carotid artery disease in patients with peripheral vascular disease: a meta-analysis // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2009. Vol. 37, N 3. P. 262-271.

    672. Pan Z. et al. Correlation between significant asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and severity of peripheral arterial occlusive disease in the lower limb: a retrospective study on 200 patients // BMC Neurol. 2019. Vol. 19, N 1. P. 259.

    673. Bergmark C., Jogestrand T., Swedenborg J. Carotid atherosclerosis in patients operated for lower extremity ischemia before the age of 50: a case control study // Ann. Vasc. Surg. 1998. Vol. 12, N 5. P. 430-435.

    674. Aboyans V. et al. 2017 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS): document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries. Endorsed by: the European Stroke Organization (ESO). The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) // Eur. Heart J. 2018. Vol. 39, N 9. P. 763-816.

    675. Национальные рекомендации по диагностике и лечению заболеваний артерий нижних конечностей [Электронный ресурс]. Москва, 2019. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ (дата обращения: 21.05.2024).

    676. Ballotta E. et al. Prospective randomized study on asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis and perioperative stroke risk in patients undergoing major vascular surgery: prophylactic or deferred carotid endarterectomy? // Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2005. Vol. 19, N 6. P. 876-881.

    677. Sonny A. et al. Lack of association between carotid artery stenosis and stroke or myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery in high-risk patients // Anesthesiology. 2014. Vol. 121, N 5. P. 922-929.

    678. Vlisides P.E. et al. Perioperative care of patients at high risk for stroke during or after non-cardiac, non-neurological surgery: 2020 guidelines from the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care // J. Neurosurg. Anesthesiol. 2020. Vol. 32, N 3. P. 210-226.

    679. Jorgensen M.E. et al. Time elapsed after ischemic stroke and risk of adverse cardiovascular events and mortality following elective noncardiac surgery // JAMA. 2014. Vol. 312, N 3. P. 269-277.

    680. Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists’ Collaboration. analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. // Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2003. Vol. 135, N 6. P. 926.

    681. Huang C.J., Fan Y.C., Tsai P.S. Differential impacts of modes of anaesthesia on the risk of stroke among preeclamptic women who undergo Caesarean delivery: a population-based study // Br. J. Anaesth. 2010. Vol. 105, N 6. P. 818-826.

    682. Mashour G.A. et al. Perioperative care of patients at high risk for stroke during or after non-cardiac, non-neurologic surgery: consensus statement from the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care // J. Neurosurg. Anesthesiol. 2014. Vol. 26, N 4. P. 273-285.

    683. Клинические рекомендации [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://rosmedex.ru/recomendations (дата обращения: 16.09.2024).

    684. Андреева Н.С. и др. Системы оценки достоверности научных доказательств и убедительности рекомендаций: сравнительная характеристика и перспективы унификации // Медицинские технологии. Оценка и выбор. 2012. Т. 4, № 10. С. 10-24.

    685. Опросник по Экспертизе и аттестации руководств INSTRUMENT. 2001.

    686. Naylor A., McCabe D. Cerebrovascular disease: decision making including medical therapy // Rutherford’s Vascular and Endovascular Therapy. 10th ed. / eds A. Sidawy, B. Perler. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2021. Chap. 92. P. 1203-1219.

    687. Супонева Н.А. и др. Валидация модифицированной шкалы Рэнкина (The Modified Rankin Scale, MRS) в России // Неврология, нейропсихиатрия, психосоматика. 2018. Т. 10, № 4. С. 36-39.

    688. Brott T. et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale // Stroke. 1989. Vol. 20, N 7. P. 864-870.

    689. Fox A.J. et al. Use of detachable balloons for proximal artery occlusion in the treatment of unclippable cerebral aneurysms // J. Neurosurg. 1987. Vol. 66, N 1. P. 40-46.

    690. Simonson T.M. et al. MR imaging and HMPAO scintigraphy in conjunction with balloon test occlusion: value in predicting sequelae after permanent carotid occlusion // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1992. Vol. 159, N 5. P. 1063-1068.

    691. Añon V.V. et al. Balloon occlusion of the internal carotid artery in 40 cases of giant intracavernous aneurysm: technical aspects, cerebral monitoring, and results // Neuroradiology. 1992. Vol. 34, N 3. P. 245-251.

    692. Niimi Y. et al. Occlusion of the internal carotid artery based on a simple tolerance test // Interv. Neuroradiol. 1996. Vol. 2, N 4. P. 289-296.

    693. Katsumata A. et al. Complication of temporary balloon test occlusion of the internal carotid artery: Experience in 119 cases // Jpn. J. Neurosurg. 2004. Vol. 13, N 8. P. 572-577.

    694. Matsubara N. et al. Multimodal assessment for balloon test occlusion of the internal carotid artery // J. Neuroendovasc. Ther. 2016. Vol. 10, N 3. P. 108-115.

    695. Brooks W.H. et al. Carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a randomized trial in a community hospital // Neurosurgery. 2004. Vol. 54, N 2. P. 318-325.

    696. Alamowitch S. et al. Risk, causes, and prevention of ischaemic stroke in elderly patients with symptomatic internal-carotid-artery stenosis // Lancet. 2001. Vol. 357, N 9263. P. 1154-1160.

    697. Inzitari D. et al. Risk factors and outcome of patients with carotid artery stenosis presenting with lacunar stroke. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Group // Neurology. 2000. Vol. 54, N 3. P. 660-666.

    698. Kappelle L.J. et al. Importance of intracranial atherosclerotic disease in patients with symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trail // Stroke. 1999. Vol. 30, N 2. P. 282-286.

    699. Henderson R.D. et al. Angiographically defined collateral circulation and risk of stroke in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group // Stroke. 2000. Vol. 31, N 1. P. 128-132.

    700. González García A. et al. Clinical predictors of hyperperfusion syndrome following carotid stenting: results from a National Prospective Multicenter Study // JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2019. Vol. 12, N 9. P. 873-882.

    701. Moulakakis K.G. et al. Hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid revascularization // J. Vasc. Surg. 2009. Vol. 49, N 4. P. 1060-1068.

    702. Wang G.J. et al. Insight into the cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome following carotid endarterectomy from the national Vascular Quality Initiative // J. Vasc. Surg. 2017. Vol. 65, N 2. P. 381-389.e2.

    703. Беляев А.Ю., Усачев Д.Ю., Лукшин В.А. Синдром церебральной гиперперфузии после каротидной эндартерэктомии. // Вопросы нейрохирургии имени академика Н.Н. Бурденко. 2011. № 3. С. 35-42.

    704. Uchida K. et al. Real-world outcomes of carotid artery stenting in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis // JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2024. Vol. 17, N 9. P. 1148-1159.

    705. He G.Y. et al. Effect of perioperative blood pressure variability on cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid artery stenting: a retrospective study // Interv. Neuroradiol. 2022. Vol. 28, N 6. P. 702-707.

    706. Komoribayashi N. et al. Cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy is associated with preoperative hemodynamic impairment and intraoperative cerebral ischemia // J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2006. Vol. 26, N 7. P. 878-884.

    707. Xin W. qiang et al. Systematic and comprehensive comparison of incidence of restenosis between carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in patients with atherosclerotic carotid stenosis // World Neurosurg. 2019. Vol. 125. P. 74-86.

    708. Li Y. et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials // PLoS One. 2017. Vol. 12, N 7. Article ID e0180804.

    709. Jung J.M. et al. Long-term durability and outcomes of carotid stenting and carotid endarterectomy // J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2017. Vol. 9, N 8. P. 750-755.

    710. Wareing T.H. et al. Strategy for the reduction of stroke incidence in cardiac surgical patients // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1993. Vol. 55, N 6. P. 1400-1408.

    711. Brener B. et al. The management of patients requiring coronary bypass and carotid endarterectomy // Surgery for Cerebrovascular Disease. 2nd ed. / ed. W.S. Moore. Pennsylvania: W.B. Saunders, 1996. P. 278-287.

    712. Borger M.A. et al. Coronary bypass and carotid endarterectomy: does a combined approach increase risk? A meta-analysis // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1999. Vol. 68, N 1. P. 14-20.

    713. Sharma V. et al. Meta-analysis of staged versus combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2014. Vol. 97, N 1. P. 102-109.

    714. Giannopoulos S. et al. Synchronous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass graft versus staged carotid artery stenting and coronary artery bypass graft for patients with concomitant severe coronary and carotid stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2020. Vol. 62. P. 463-473.e4.

    715. Fareed K.R. et al. Synchronous carotid endarterectomy and off-pump coronary bypass: an updated, systematic review of early outcomes // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2009. Vol. 37, N 4. P. 375-378.

    716. Guzman L.A. et al. A systematic review of outcomes in patients with staged carotid artery stenting and coronary artery bypass graft surgery // Stroke. 2008. Vol. 39, N 2. P. 361-365.

    717. Gopaldas R.R. et al. Staged versus synchronous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting: analysis of 10-year nationwide outcomes // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2011. Vol. 91, N 5. P. 1323-1329.

    718. Dubinsky R.M., Lai S.M. Mortality from combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass surgery in the US // Neurology. 2007. Vol. 68, N 3. P. 195- 197.

    719. Колесников Л.Л. Terminologia Anatomica / Международная анатомическая терминология // Москва : Медицина, 2003. 424 с.

    720. Rapp J., Patel P. Carotid artery stenting // The Interventional Cardiac Catheterization Handbook. 3rd ed. Elsevier, 2012. P. 450.

    Материалы данного сайта распространяются на условиях лицензии CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International)

    © ООО Издательская группа «ГЭОТАР-Медиа». Использование текстового и иллюстративного материала данного издания для обучения любых систем искусственного интеллекта, включая машинное обучение и нейросети, запрещено без письменного разрешения правообладателя.

    • Российское Общество ангиологов и сосудистых хирургов
    • ВКонтакте
    • Telegram
    Главный редактор
    ГЛАВНЫЙ РЕДАКТОР
    Белов Юрий Владимирович
    Академик РАН, доктор медицинских наук, профессор, президент Российского общества ангиологов и сосудистых хирургов

     

    Глубокоуважаемые коллеги!
    В соответствии с решением президиума Российского общества ангиологов и сосудистых хирургов журналу «Ангиология и сосудистая хирургия» присвоено имя академика А.В. Покровского. Номер регистрации нового наименования:
    ПИ № ФС 77 - 85714 от 14.08.2023.

    Журналы «ГЭОТАР-Медиа»